Published November 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Methane production kinetics of pretreated slaughterhouse wastewater

  • 1. Departamento de Biotecnología, División de Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Apartado Postal 55-534, Ciudad de México, 09340 (Mexico)
  • 2. Departamento de Ingeniería de Procesos e Hidráulica. División de Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Apartado Postal 55-534, Ciudad de México, 09340 (Mexico)
  • 3. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas. División de Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco, Av. San Pablo 180, Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas, 02200, Ciudad de México (Mexico)

Description

Highlights: • Methane production increased significantly with the combination of both pretreatments regards slaughterhouse wastewater. • Thermal pretreatment produced two phases: a liquid (clarified) and a semisolid, which concentrated most pollutants. • The optimal volumetric ratio was 4:1, equivalent to a substrate/inoculum ratio of 4.26. • Methane production kinetics in the semisolid was complex and followed stepped curves. • The Luedeking-Piret and the Gompertz models adequately described methane production from semisolid. -- Abstract: The aim of this work was to analyze the methane production kinetics of pretreated slaughterhouse wastewater through biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests, where the volumetric ratio and, consequently, the substrate to inoculum ratio (SIR) were varied. The thermal pretreatment was autoclaving (60 min at 120C/1.2 atm), and two phases appeared: liquid (clarified) and semisolid. Half of this semisolid also underwent a mechanical pretreatment (1 min with a cell disruptor). Afterward, BMP tests were carried out in serological bottles under five different volumetric ratios (1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 4:1 and 5:1), with RSWW, semisolid and semisolid after mechanical pretreatment as substrates. The volume of clarified liquid obtained after autoclaving was 84.5% of the RSWW, with removal percentages of COD, solids, proteins, and ammonium ranging from 50% to 89%, while the volume of the semisolid was only 4.35% of the RSWW, with the major portion of the pollutants concentrated in it. In the BMP tests, the methane generation was approximately fifteen times higher and lasted two times longer with semisolid as the substrate than that when using RSWW. The optimal volumetric ratio was 4:1 (SIR 5.67). The methane kinetics also changed: in RSWW, the kinetics followed the typical sigmoidal curve, whereas in semisolid, the kinetics were complex, showing a stepped curve. The cumulative methane production fit well to the Gompertz, Richards, logistic, Luedeking-Piret and modified first-order rate models, although none of them accurately described the second inflection point found at the end of the inhibited steady-state phase.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105385;
PII
S0961953419303344;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Biomass and Bioenergy
Journal Volume
130
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0961-9534
CODEN
BMSBEO

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55055648
Subject category
S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
Descriptors DEI
ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; APPROXIMATIONS; AUTOCLAVES; METHANE; POLLUTANTS; PROTEINS; SUBSTRATES; WASTE WATER
Descriptors DEC
ALKANES; BIOCONVERSION; CALCULATION METHODS; DIGESTION; HYDROCARBONS; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; LIQUID WASTES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; WASTES; WATER

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.