Published September 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Dynamic global vegetation models underestimate net CO2 flux mean and inter-annual variability in dryland ecosystems

  • 1. Department of Geography, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 (United States)
  • 2. Southwest Watershed Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Tucson, AZ 85719 (United States)
  • 3. Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Universiteé Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette F-91191 (France)
  • 4. School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 (United States)
  • 5. Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 (United States)
  • 6. NOAA/ARL Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 (United States)
  • 7. Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC (Canada)
  • 8. Science Partners, Paris 75010 (France)
  • 9. Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Saint-Aubin (France)
  • 10. Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80302 (United States)
  • 11. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstraße 53, Hamburg 20146 (Germany)
  • 12. College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Exeter EX4 4QE (United Kingdom)
  • 13. Environmental Sciences Division and Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 (United States)

Description

Despite their sparse vegetation, dryland regions exert a huge influence over global biogeochemical cycles because they cover more than 40% of the world surface (Schimel 2010 Science 327 418–9). It is thought that drylands dominate the inter-annual variability (IAV) and long-term trend in the global carbon (C) cycle (Poulter et al 2014 Nature 509 600–3, Ahlstrom et al 2015 Science 348 895–9, Zhang et al 2018 Glob. Change Biol. 24 3954–68). Projections of the global land C sink therefore rely on accurate representation of dryland C cycle processes; however, the dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) used in future projections have rarely been evaluated against dryland C flux data. Here, we carried out an evaluation of 14 DGVMs (TRENDY v7) against net ecosystem exchange (NEE) data from 12 dryland flux sites in the southwestern US encompassing a range of ecosystem types (forests, shrub- and grasslands). We find that all the models underestimate both mean annual C uptake/release as well as the magnitude of NEE IAV, suggesting that improvements in representing dryland regions may improve global C cycle projections. Across all models, the sensitivity and timing of ecosystem C uptake to plant available moisture was at fault. Spring biases in gross primary production (GPP) dominate the underestimate of mean annual NEE, whereas models' lack of GPP response to water availability in both spring and summer monsoon are responsible for inability to capture NEE IAV. Errors in GPP moisture sensitivity at high elevation forested sites were more prominent during the spring, while errors at the low elevation shrub and grass-dominated sites were more important during the monsoon. We propose a range of hypotheses for why model GPP does not respond sufficiently to changing water availability that can serve as a guide for future dryland DGVM developments. Our analysis suggests that improvements in modeling C cycle processes across more than a quarter of the Earth's land surface could be achieved by addressing the moisture sensitivity of dryland C uptake. (letter)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1a38

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Research Letters
Journal Volume
16
Journal Issue
9
Journal Page Range
[12 p.]
ISSN
1748-9326

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53053720
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
CARBON DIOXIDE; FORESTS; GRAMINEAE; MOISTURE; MONSOONS; RANGELANDS; SHRUBS
Descriptors DEC
CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; ECOSYSTEMS; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PLANTS; STORMS; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS