Published May 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Systematic map of the literature on carbon lock-in induced by long-lived capital

  • 1. Centre International de Recherche sur l'Environnement et le Developpement, 45 bis avenue de la Belle Gabrielle, Nogent-sur-Marne Cedex 94736 (France)
  • 2. Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Torgauer Straße 12-15, EUREF 19, 10829 Berlin (Germany)

Description

Long-lived capital-stocks (LLCS) such as infrastructure and buildings have significant and long-lasting implications for greenhouse gas emissions. They contribute to carbon lock-in and may hinder a rapid decarbonization of energy systems. Here we provide a systematic map of the literature on carbon lock-in induced by LLCS. Based on a structured search of the Web of Science and Scopus, we identified 226 publications from 38 095 search results using a supervised machine learning approach. We show biases toward power generation and toward developed countries. We also identify 11 indicators used to quantify carbon lock-in. Quantifications of committed emissions (cumulative emissions that would occur over the remaining operational lifetime of an asset) or stranded assets (premature retirement/retrofitting or under-utilization of assets along a given pathway) are the most commonly used metrics, whereas institutional indicators are scarcely represented. The synthesis of quantifications shows that (i) global committed emissions have slightly increased over time, (ii) coal power plants are a major source of committed emissions and are exposed to risk of becoming stranded, (iii) delayed mitigation action increases stranded assets and (iv) sectoral distribution and amount of stranded assets differ between countries. A thematic analysis of policy implications highlights the need to assure stability and legitimacy of climate policies and to enable coordination between stakeholders. Carbon pricing is one of the most cited policy instrument, but the literature emphasizes that it should not be the only instrument used and should instead be complemented with other policy instruments, such as technical regulations and financial support for low carbon capital deployment. Further research is warranted on urban-scale, in developing countries and outside the electricity generation sector, notably on buildings, where stranded assets could be high. (topical review)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba660

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Research Letters
Journal Volume
16
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
[20 p.]
ISSN
1748-9326

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53053529
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Numerical Data
Descriptors DEI
CARBON; COAL; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FINANCIAL DATA; MACHINE LEARNING; POWER GENERATION
Descriptors DEC
ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS; DATA; ELEMENTS; ENERGY SOURCES; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; INFORMATION; LEARNING; MATERIALS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; NONMETALS; NUMERICAL DATA