Published July 15, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Sensitivity analysis of different wind speed distribution models with actual and truncated wind data: A case study for Kerman, Iran

  • 1. Department of Electrical Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
  • 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111 (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
  • 3. Industrial Engineering Department, Yazd University, Yazd (Iran, Islamic Republic of)

Description

Highlights: • Sensitivity of four wind speed distributions functions are investigated. • Two sets of wind data consist of the actual and truncated data are created. • MOM and MLE are used to estimate the parameters used in the distribution functions. • Nine goodness-of-fit indices are examined to find best fit function. • The most effective distribution model is the Weibull and MLE estimator for the truncated data. - Abstract: Accuracy of wind speed data has important impact on determining wind power output from a wind turbine. There are many researches on four widely used wind speed distribution models described by gamma, lognormal, Rayleigh and Weibull for assessing wind potentials. However, there is lack of studies to evaluate sensitivity of these models with respect to accuracy of the measured wind data. In this paper, wind speed data are obtained from SUNA (renewable energy organization of Iran) for two years period from 2014 to 2016 in 10 min time intervals, for five stations in the province of Kerman in Iran. The maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE) and method of moments (MOM) are used for calculating parameters involved with these four distribution functions. For sensitivity analysis, a truncated set of wind data is generated by removing the decimal digits of the wind data; reducing the resolution to 1 m/s. The best fit functions to actual and truncated wind speed data are selected by examining nine goodness-of-fit statistics. From the results, it is observed that the lognormal function gives a better fit to the actual data, while the Weibull model performs better using the truncated wind speed data. The Rayleigh distribution does not fit well for both data types. The MOM method has performed better for calculating the parameters of the gamma distribution while the MLE is the preferred method for obtaining the parameters of the Weibull function particularly when working with truncated wind data.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.078

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.078;
PII
S0196-8904(16)30328-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Conversion and Management
Journal Volume
120
Journal Page Range
p. 51-61
ISSN
0196-8904
CODEN
ECMADL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.