Published 2005 | Version v1
Miscellaneous

Simulating the transient regime for main condensate system at Cernavoda NPP

  • 1. Departament of Nuclear Power and Nuclear Fuel Cycle Development, Center of Technology and Engineering for Nuclear Projects, CITON, 111 Atomistilor Street, PO Box 5204-MG-04 Bucharest - Magurele (Romania)
  • 2. Power Engineering Faculty, Bucharest Politehnica University, 313 Splaiul Independentei, RO-060032, Bucharest 16 (Romania)

Description

The purpose of this project is to make a Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of Main Condensate System for getting real-time answer of installation during regimes occurring during normal and abnormal operation. To obtain the analyses the MMS code was used. The boundaries of the systems analysis are extended to Main Feedwater System in order to get a realistic response of Deaerator equipment which are situated between those two systems and have entrances from both systems. In this way we made a complex analysis with main condenser and steam generators as boundaries. We obtained a model for the entire chain of condensate and feedwater preheater with interface just turbine bleed steam. From that we could reduce the number of assumptions necessary to make the analysis. The analyses consist in hydraulics and thermal hydraulics analyses, respectively. For the first case analysed are: - the nominal operation regime with main condensate pumps; - start-up regime with total circulate of condensate to condenser; - 25% MCR (Maximum Continuous Rate) regime (this regime was used in designing the condensate regulating valves at low flow; - 40% MCR regime (with circulate of some condensate flow to condenser); - operating regime of 60% MCR with one main condensate pump operating; - operating regime with auxiliary condensate pump; - operating regime with discharging a condensate flow to condensate storage tank. The thermal hydraulic analyses deal with normal and abnormal operating regimes, respectively. In the first case analysed are the following regimes: - nominal operating regime with main condensate pump operating 100% MCR; - transient regime, 100-80% MCR; - transient regime, 100-80-60% MCR with two pumps in operation and 60 % MCR with one main condensate pump in operation; - transient regime, 100-80-60-60-40 % MCR; - shut-down regime; - start-up regime from Hot zero power to rated power regime. Finally, for the abnormal operating regimes the analyses concerned: - transient regime 100-90% MCR with by-pass of LP1 (low pressure heater) and CC (Condensate Cooler); - transient regime, 100-90% MCR with by-pass of LP2 and LP3; - turbine trip; - reactor trip; - loss of two main condensate pumps. The results were compared with Heat Balance made by General Electric (turbine supplier) for several stationary regimes. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from authors or Power Engineering Faculty, Bucharest Politehnica University, 313 Splaiul Independentei, RO-060032, Bucharest 16 (RO)
Part of:
International Conference on Energy-Environment, CIEM 2005

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
Editura Universul Energiei
Imprint Place
Bucharest (Romania)
Imprint Title
International Conference on Energy-Environment, CIEM 2005
Imprint Pagination
615 p.
Journal Page Range
p. 6.26-6.26

Conference

Title
international conference on energy-environment
Acronym
CIEM 2005
Dates
20-21 Oct 2005
Place
Bucharest (Romania)

Optional Information

Notes
4 refs., 7 figs.