Published April 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

Influence of field strength, coil type and image resolution on assessment of synovitis by unenhanced MRI - a comparison with contrast-enhanced MRI

  • 1. Tel Aviv University, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv (Israel)
  • 2. The Sheba Medical Center, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Tel Hashomer (Israel)
  • 3. Copenhagen University Hospital Glostrup, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen (Denmark)
  • 4. Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Department of Rheumatology/C, Copenhagen (Denmark)
  • 5. Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Oslo (Norway)
  • 6. Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev, Department of Radiology, Copenhagen (Denmark)
  • 7. Metropolitan University College, Copenhagen (Denmark)

Description

To explore if the reliability of synovitis assessment by unenhanced MRI is influenced by different MRI field-strengths, coil types and image resolutions in RA patients. Forty-one RA patients and 12 healthy controls underwent hand MRI (wrist and 2nd-5th metacarpophalangeal joints) at 4 different field-strengths (0.23 T/0.6 T/1.5 T/3.0 T) on the same day. Seven protocols using a STIR sequence with different field-strengths, coils (flex coils/dedicated phased-array extremity coils) and resolution were applied and scored blindly for synovitis (OMERACT-RAMRIS method). A 1.5 T post-contrast T1-weighted sequence was used as gold standard reference. Fair-good agreement (ICC=0.38-0.72) between the standard reference and the different STIR protocols (best agreement with extremity coil and small voxel size at 1.5 T). The accuracy for presence/absence of synovitis was very high per person (0.80-1.0), and moderate-high per joint (0.63-0.85), whereas exact agreements on scores were moderate (0.50-0.66). The intrareader agreement (15 patients and 3 controls) on presence/absence of synovitis was very high (0.87-1.0). Unenhanced MRI using STIR sequence is only moderately reliable for assessing hand synovitis in RA, when contrast-enhanced MRI is considered the gold standard reference. Contrast injection, field strength and coil type influence synovitis assessment, and should be considered before performing MRI in clinical trials and practice. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3470-9

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
25
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 1059-1067
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3