Does energy efficiency increase at the expense of output performance: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Jiangsu province, China
Creators
- 1. School of Economics, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou, 310018 (China)
- 2. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875 (China)
- 3. School of Urban and Regional Science, Institute of Finance and Economics Research, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, 200433 (China)
Description
Highlights: • Unique firm-level data are used to evaluate energy efficiency of firms in Jiangsu. • The trade-off between output performance and energy efficiency is analyzed. • Textile firms with high performance can balance energy efficiency improvement. • Energy efficiency improvement targets may impair performance of chemical firms. To mitigate environmental pollution and reduce energy wastes, the Chinese central government has launched a quantitative and binding energy efficiency improvement target since the 11th Five-year-plan. Specific targets were assigned to manufacturing firms since the manufacturing industry is the largest energy user and pollutant emitter. Thus, it is of great significance for manufacturing firms that energy efficiency is improved, however, without impairing output performance. Thus, we first applied an undesirable-output-based data envelopment analysis method to evaluate the energy efficiency and the output efficiency of 269 textile and chemical firms, and then used regression models to investigate the interaction between energy efficiency and output efficiency. We find that in the case of textile firms, energy efficiency is positively correlated with output efficiency. Conversely, textile firms with high output performance usually have high energy efficiency scores. In other words, textile firms can deal with a good trade-off between energy efficiency and output efficiency. Besides, we observe that increases in tax and operating expenses for textile firms impair output and energy efficiency. Moreover, larger firms benefiting from economies of scale have higher output and energy efficiency scores. In contrast, in the case of energy-intensive chemical firms, no such trade-off is found.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119704Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119704;
- PII
- S0360544220328115;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy (Oxford)
- Journal Volume
- 220
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0360-5442
- CODEN
- ENEYDS
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54000780
- Subject category
- S32: ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION;
- Descriptors DEI
- BINDING ENERGY; ECONOMY; ENERGY BALANCE; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; POLLUTANTS
- Descriptors DEC
- EFFICIENCY; ENERGY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.