Published November 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Dynamic contrast-enhanced case-control analysis in 3T MRI of prostate cancer can help to characterize tumor aggressiveness

  • 1. GIBI230, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia (Spain)
  • 2. Radiology Department, Hospital Quirónsalud Valencia, Valencia (Spain)
  • 3. Biomedical Engineering, Hospital Quirónsalud Valencia, Valencia (Spain)
  • 4. CIBER-SAM, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid (Spain)

Description

Highlights: • Curve types showed no statistical association with healthy/tumor peripheral areas. • Ktrans, ve, upslope and AUC showed significant differences in controls vs. tumors. • The global diagnostic performance of standard MRI perfusion parameters is poor. • Normalized Ktrans, upslope and AUC had good diagnostic accuracy for tumor grading. - Abstract: Purpose: The aim of this work is to establish normality and tumor tissue ranges for perfusion parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR of the peripheral prostate at 3T and to compare the diagnostic performance of quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters. Materials and methods: Thirty-six patients with prostate carcinomas (18 Gleason-6, 15 Gleason-7, and 3 Gleason-8) and 33 healthy subjects were included. Image analysis workflow comprised four steps: manual segmentation of whole prostate and lesions, series registration, voxelwise T1 mapping and calculation of pharmacokinetic and semi-quantitative parameters. Results: Ktrans, ve, upslope and AUC60 showed statistically significant differences between healthy peripheral areas and tumors. Curve type showed no association with healthy/tumor peripheral areas (chi-square = 0.702). Areas under the ROC curves were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.54–0.75), 0.70 (0.60–0.80), 0.62 (0.51–0.72) and 0.63 (0.52–0.74) for Ktrans, ve, upslope and AUC60, respectively. The optimal cutoff values were: Ktrans = 0.21 min−1 (sensitivity = 0.61, specificity = 0.64), ve = 0.36 (0.63, 0.71), upslope = 0.59 (0.59, 0.59) and AUC60 = 2.4 (0.63, 0.64). Significant differences were found between Gleason scores 6 and 7 for normalized Ktrans, upslope and AUC60, with good diagnostic accuracy (area under ROC curve 0.80, 95% CI: 0.60–1.00). Conclusion: Quantitative (Ktrans and ve) and semi-quantitative (upslope and AUC60) perfusion parameters showed significant differences between tumors and control areas in the peripheral prostate. Normalized Ktrans, upslope and AUC60 values might characterize tumor aggressiveness.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.022

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.022;
PII
S0720-048X(16)30291-1;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
85
Journal Issue
11
Journal Page Range
p. 2119-2126
ISSN
0720-048X
CODEN
EJRADR

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49006169
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; NEOPLASMS; NMR IMAGING; PROSTATE
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; GLANDS; MALE GENITALS; ORGANS; PROCESSING

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.