Published July 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

China's energy-water nexus – assessment of the energy sector's compliance with the "3 Red Lines" industrial water policy

  • 1. Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge, CB2 1 PZ (United Kingdom)

Description

Increasing population and economic growth continue to drive China's demand for energy and water resources. The interaction of these resources is particularly important in China, where water resources are unevenly distributed, with limited availability in coal-rich regions. The "3 Red Lines" water policies were introduced in 2011; one of their aims is to reduce industrial water use, of which the energy sector is a part. This paper analyses current water withdrawals and consumption for all energy processes and assesses the sector's compliance with the industrial water policy under different scenarios, considering potential future policy and technological changes. The results show that future energy plans could conflict with the industrial water policy, but the amount of water used in the energy sector is highly dependant on technology choices, especially for power plant cooling. High electricity demand in the future is expected to be met mainly by coal and nuclear power, and planned inland development of nuclear power presents a new source of freshwater demand. Taking a holistic view of energy and water-for-energy enables the identification of co-benefits and trade-offs between energy and water policies that can facilitate the development of more compatible and sustainable energy and water plans. -- Highlights: •A whole systems analysis of current and future water used for energy is presented. •The energy sector's compliance with the "3 Red Lines" water policies is assessed. •Future energy plans could conflict with the "3 Red Lines" industrial water policy. •Water used for energy is highly dependant on technology choices. •Co-benefits and trade-offs between future energy and water plans are identified

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.013

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.013;
PII
S0301-4215(15)00119-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
82
Journal Issue
Complete
Journal Page Range
p. 131-143
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47032974
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
AUGMENTATION; CHINA; COMPLIANCE; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY DEMAND; ENERGY POLICY; NUCLEAR POWER; POWER PLANTS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; WATER POLICY; WATER RESOURCES
Descriptors DEC
ASIA; DEMAND; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; POWER; RESOURCES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.