Published 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Opportunistic application of phantom-less calibration methods for fracture risk prediction using QCT/FEA

  • 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, 78249, San Antonio, TX (United States)
  • 2. Kogod Center on Aging and Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (United States)
  • 3. Department of Orthopedics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (United States)

Description

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element analysis (FEA) implements a calibration phantom to estimate bone mineral density (BMD) and assign material properties to the models. The objectives of this study were to (1) propose robust phantom-less calibration methods, using subject-specific tissues, to obtain vertebral fracture properties estimations using QCT/FEA; and (2) correlate QCT/FEA predictions to DXA values of areal BMD. Eighty of a cohort of 111 clinical QCT scans were used to obtain subject-specific parameters using a phantom calibration approach and for the development of the phantom-less calibration equations. Equations were developed based on the HU measured from various soft tissues and regions, and using multiple linear regression analyses. Thirty-one additional QCT scans were used for cross-validation of QCT/FEA estimated fracture loads from the L3 vertebrae based on the phantom and phantom-less equations. Finally, QCT/FEA-predicted fracture loads were correlated with aBMD obtained from DXA. Overall, 217 QCT/FEA models from 31 subjects (20 females, 11 men) with mean ages of 69.6 (13.1) and 67.3 (14) were used to cross-validate the phantom-less equations and assess bone strength. The proposed phantom-less equations showed high correlations with phantom-based estimates of BMD (99%). Cross-validation of QCT/FEA-predicted fracture loads from phantom-less equations and phantom-specific outcomes resulted in high correlations for all proposed methods (0.94-0.99). QCT/FEA correlation outcomes from the phantom-less equations and DXA-aBMD were moderately high (0.64-0.68). The proposed QCT/FEA subject-specific phantom-less calibration methods demonstrated the potential to be applied to both prospective and retrospective applications in the clinical setting.

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08071-w

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology (Internet)
Journal Volume
31
Journal Issue
12
Journal Page Range
p. 9428-9435
ISSN
1432-1084
CODEN
EURAE3