Published September 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Optimizing the insulation thickness of walls and roofs of existing buildings based on primary energy consumption, global cost and pollutant emissions

  • 1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing 102617 (China)
  • 2. School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Shandong Huayu University of Technology, Dezhou 253034 (China)
  • 3. Qingdao Energy and Thermal Power Co., Ltd, Qingdao 266000 (China)
  • 4. Qingdao Wall Materials Innovation and Building Energy Efficiency Management Office, Qingdao 266000 (China)

Description

Highlights: • An optimization model on the optimum insulation thickness of walls and roofs of existing buildings is established. • The optimum insulation thickness is determined based on primary energy consumption, global cost and pollutant emissions. • Four heat and cold sources are analyzed in a case study. • Optimization results depended on the weight coefficients of evaluation criteria and types of heat and cold sources. An optimization model used to determine the optimum insulation thickness (OIT) of walls and roofs of existing buildings was established. Primary energy saving ratio (PESR), global cost saving ratio (GCSR) and pollutant emission reduction ratio (PERR) were used as evaluation criteria. Least square method was used to fit the polynomials which indicated the relationship between annual air-conditioning demand and insulation thickness. An existing building was used as the basis of the case study. The average relative error on annual heating and cooling demand was 0.23% and 0.035%, respectively, which indicated the accuracy of both fitting polynomials. Four types of heat and cold sources were considered to be used for the case building, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to investigate the impact of economic and energy factors on the optimization results. Results showed that the OIT of walls and roofs could be obtained by using the optimization model. The OIT of walls and roofs, building performance indicators and overall evaluation criterion during building envelope retrofit depended on the weight coefficients of evaluation criteria and types of heat and cold sources. The impact of sensitivity factors on the optimization results for the four types of heat and cold sources were different.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.179

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.179;
PII
S0360544218312441;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy (Oxford)
Journal Volume
159
Journal Page Range
p. 1132-1147
ISSN
0360-5442
CODEN
ENEYDS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.