Published 2022 | Version v1
Journal article

Longitudinal imaging history in early identification of intimate partner violence

  • 1. Trauma Imaging Research and Innovation Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, 02115, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 2. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 3. Department of Radiology, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (United States)
  • 4. Department of Radiology, Lahey Health Medical Center, Burlington, MA (United States)
  • 5. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 6. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (United States)
  • 7. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 8. Division of Women's Health, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (United States)

Description

To describe the imaging findings of intimate partner violence (IPV)-related injury and to evaluate the role of longitudinal imaging review in detecting IPV. Radiology studies were reviewed in chronological order and IPV-related injuries were recorded among 400 victims of any type of abuse (group 1) and 288 of physical abuse (group 2) from January 2013 to June 2018. The likelihood of IPV was assessed as low/moderate/high based on the review of (1) current and prior anatomically related studies only and (2) longitudinal imaging history consisting of all prior studies. The first radiological study date with moderate/high suspicion was compared to the self-reported date by the victim. A total of 135 victims (33.8%) in group 1 and 144 victims (50%) in group 2 demonstrated IPV-related injuries. Musculoskeletal injury was most common (58.2% and 44.5% in groups 1 and 2, respectively; most commonly lower/upper extremity fractures), followed by neurologic injury (20.9% and 32.9% in groups 1 and 2, respectively; most commonly facial injury). With longitudinal imaging history, radiologists were able to identify IPV in 31% of group 1 and 46.5% of group 2 patients. Amongst these patients, earlier identification by radiologists was provided compared to the self-reported date in 62.3% of group 1 (median, 64 months) and in 52.6% of group 2 (median, 69.3 months). Musculoskeletal and neurological injuries were the most common IPV-related injuries. Knowledge of common injuries and longitudinal imaging history may help IPV identification when victims are not forthcoming. Musculoskeletal injuries were the most common type of IPV-related injury, followed by neurological injuries. With longitudinal imaging history, radiologists were able to better raise the suspicion of IPV compared to the selective review of anatomically related studies only. With longitudinal imaging history, radiologists were able to identify IPV earlier than the self-reported date by a median of 64 months in any type of abuse, and a median of 69.3 months in physical abuse.

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08362-2

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology (Internet)
Journal Volume
32
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 2824-2836
ISSN
1432-1084
CODEN
EURAE3

INIS

Country of Publication
Germany
Country of Input or Organization
Germany
INIS RN
53044976
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Numerical Data
Descriptors DEI
ARMS; BONE FRACTURES; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPILED DATA; CRIME DETECTION; FACE; LEGS; MUSCLES; RADIOLOGY; REVIEWS; TIME DELAY; WOUNDS
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DATA; DETECTION; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; EVALUATION; HEAD; INFORMATION; INJURIES; LIMBS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; NUMERICAL DATA