Stereotactic radiosurgery for four or more intracranial metastases
- 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
- 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA (United States) and Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
- 3. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
Description
Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes after a single stereotactic radiosurgery procedure for the care of patients with 4 or more intracranial metastases. Methods and Materials: Two hundred five patients with primary malignancies, including non-small-cell lung carcinoma (42%), breast carcinoma (23%), melanoma (17%), renal cell carcinoma (6%), colon cancer (3%), and others (10%) underwent gamma knife radiosurgery for 4 or more intracranial metastases at one time. The median number of brain metastases was 5 (range, 4-18) with a median total treatment volume of 6.8 cc (range, 0.6-51.0 cc). Radiosurgery was used as sole management (17% of patients), or in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (46%) or after failure of whole brain radiotherapy (38%). The median marginal radiosurgery dose was 16 Gy (range, 12-20 Gy). The mean follow-up was 8 months. Results: The median overall survival after radiosurgery for all patients was 8 months. The 1-year local control rate was 71%, and the median time to progressive/new brain metastases was 9 months. Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification system, the median overall survivals for RPA classes I, II, and III were 18, 9, and 3 months, respectively (p < 0.00001). Multivariate analysis revealed total treatment volume, age, RPA classification, and marginal dose as significant prognostic factors. The number of metastases was not statistically significant (p 0.333). Conclusion: Radiosurgery seems to provide survival benefit for patients with 4 or more intracranial metastases. Because total treatment volume was the most significant predictor of survival, the total volume of brain metastases, rather than the number of metastases, should be considered in identifying appropriate radiosurgery candidates
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.08.035;
- PII
- S0360-3016(05)02580-0;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
- Journal Volume
- 64
- Journal Issue
- 3
- Journal Page Range
- p. 898-903
- ISSN
- 0360-3016
- CODEN
- IOBPD3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 37095001
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- BRAIN; FAILURES; LARGE INTESTINE; LUNGS; MAMMARY GLANDS; MELANOMAS; METASTASES; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENTS; RADIOTHERAPY; SURGERY
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; CARCINOMAS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; EPITHELIOMAS; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GLANDS; INTESTINES; MATHEMATICS; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; STATISTICS; THERAPY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2006 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.