Published August 1, 2006 | Version v1
Journal article

Influence of margin status and radiation on recurrence after radical hysterectomy in Stage IB cervical cancer

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 2. Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 4. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (United States)

Description

Purpose: To examine the relationship between margin status and local recurrence (LR) or any recurrence after radical hysterectomy (RH) in women treated with or without radiotherapy (RT) for Stage IB cervical carcinoma. Methods and Materials: This study included 284 patients after RH with assessable margins between 1980 and 2000. Each margin was scored as negative (≥1 cm), close (>0 and <1 cm), or positive. The outcomes measured were any recurrence, LR, and relapse-free survival. Results: The crude rate for any recurrence was 11%, 20%, and 38% for patients with negative, close, and positive margins, respectively. The crude rate for LR was 10%, 11%, and 38%, respectively. Postoperative RT decreased the rate of LR from 10% to 0% for negative, 17% to 0% for close, and 50% to 25% for positive margins. The significant predictors of decreased relapse-free survival on univariate analysis were the depth of tumor invasion (hazard ratio [HR] 2.14/cm increase, p = 0.007), positive margins (HR 3.92, p = 0.02), tumor size (HR 1.3/cm increase, p = 0.02), lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.19, p = 0.03), and margin status (HR 0.002/increasing millimeter from cancer for those with close margins, p = 0.03). Long-term side effects occurred in 8% after RH and 19% after RH and RT. Conclusion: The use of postoperative RT may decrease the risk of LR in patients with close paracervical margins. Patients with other adverse prognostic factors and close margins may also benefit from the use of postoperative RT. However, RT after RH may increase the risk of long-term side effects

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.010;
PII
S0360-3016(06)00416-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
65
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 1501-1507
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
38020496
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CARCINOMAS; HEALTH HAZARDS; PATIENTS; RADIOTHERAPY; SIDE EFFECTS; SURGERY
Descriptors DEC
DISEASES; HAZARDS; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2006 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.