Linking environment-productivity trade-offs and correlated uncertainties: Greenhouse gas emissions and crop productivity in paddy rice production systems
- 1. Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 3-1-3 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8604 (Japan)
- 2. Crop Research Center, Niigata Agricultural Research Institute, 857 Nagakura-machi, Nagaoka, Niigata 940-0826 (Japan)
- 3. Mie Prefecture Agricultural Research Institute, 530 Kawakita-cho, Ureshino, Matsusaka, Mie 515-2316 (Japan)
Description
In comparative life cycle assessments of agricultural production systems, analyses of both the trade-offs between environmental impacts and crop productivity and of the uncertainties specific to agriculture such as fluctuations in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and crop yields are crucial. However, these two issues are usually analyzed separately. In this paper, we present a framework to link trade-off and uncertainty analyses; correlated uncertainties are integrated into environment-productivity trade-off analyses. We compared three rice production systems in Japan: a system using a pelletized, nitrogen-concentrated organic fertilizer made from poultry manure using closed-air composting techniques (high-N system), a system using a conventional organic fertilizer made from poultry manure using open-air composting techniques (low-N system), and a system using a chemical compound fertilizer (conventional system). We focused on two important sources of uncertainties in paddy rice cultivation—methane emissions from paddy fields and crop yields. We found trade-offs between the conventional and high-N systems and the low-N system and the existence of positively correlated uncertainties in the conventional and high-N systems. We concluded that our framework is effective in recommending the high-N system compared with the low-N system, although the performance of the former is almost the same as the conventional system. - Highlights: • Correlated uncertainties were integrated into environment-productivity trade-offs. • Life cycle GHG emissions and crop yields were analyzed using field and survey data. • Three rice production systems using chemical or organic fertilizers were compared. • There were portfolio (insurance) effects in matured technologies. • Analysis of trade-offs and correlated uncertainties will be useful for decisions.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.138Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.138;
- PII
- S0048-9697(16)31583-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Science of the Total Environment
- Journal Volume
- 571
- Journal Page Range
- p. 134-141
- ISSN
- 0048-9697
- CODEN
- STENDL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48090297
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- COMPOSTING; CROPS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FERTILIZERS; FOWL; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MANURES; METHANE; PRODUCTIVITY; RICE
- Descriptors DEC
- AGRICULTURAL WASTES; ALKANES; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOLOGICAL WASTES; BIRDS; CEREALS; GRAMINEAE; HYDROCARBONS; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MANAGEMENT; MATERIALS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC WASTES; PLANTS; PROCESSING; VERTEBRATES; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE PROCESSING; WASTES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.