Published November 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

Pressure drop, flow pattern and local water volume fraction measurements of oil–water flow in pipes

  • 1. Telemark University College, PO Box 203, N-3901 Porsgrunn (Norway)

Description

Oil–water flow in horizontal and slightly inclined pipes was investigated. The experimental activities were performed using the multiphase flow loop at Telemark University College, Porsgrunn, Norway. The experiments were conducted in a 15 m long, 56 mm diameter, inclinable steel pipe using Exxsol D60 oil (density of 790 kg m−3 and viscosity of 1.64 mPa s) and water (density of 996 kg m−3 and viscosity of 1.00 mPa s) as test fluids. The test pipe inclination was changed in the range from 5° upward to 5° downward. Mixture velocity and inlet water cut vary up to 1.50 m s−1 and 0.975, respectively. The time-averaged cross-sectional distributions of oil and water were measured with a single-beam gamma densitometer. The pressure drop along the test section of the pipe was also measured. The characterization of flow patterns and identification of their boundaries are achieved via visual observations and by analysis of local water volume fraction measurements. The observed flow patterns were presented in terms of flow pattern maps for different pipe inclinations. In inclined flows, dispersions appear at lower mixture velocities compared to the horizontal flows. Smoothly stratified flows observed in the horizontal pipe disappeared in upwardly inclined pipes and new flow patterns, plug flow and stratified wavy flow were observed. The water-in-oil dispersed flow regime slightly shrinks as the pipe inclination increases. In inclined flows, the dispersed oil-in-water flow regime extended to lower mixture velocities and lower inlet water cuts. The present experimental data were compared with the results of a flow-pattern-dependent prediction model, which uses the area-averaged steady-state two-fluid model for stratified flow and the homogeneous model for dispersed flow. The two-fluid model was able to predict the pressure drop and water hold-up for stratified flow. The homogeneous model was not able to predict the pressure profile of dispersed oil–water flow at higher water cuts. The two-fluid model and the homogeneous model over-predict the pressure drop for dual-continuous flow

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/20/11/114004

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1088/0957-0233/20/11/114004;
PII
S0957-0233(09)07760-1;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Measurement Science and Technology
Journal Volume
20
Journal Issue
11
Journal Page Range
[18 p.]
ISSN
0957-0233
CODEN
MSTCEP

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
45005403
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
DENSITY; FLUIDS; INCLINATION; MIXTURES; MULTIPHASE FLOW; OILS; PIPES; PRESSURE DROP; STEELS; VISCOSITY; WATER
Descriptors DEC
ALLOYS; CARBON ADDITIONS; DISPERSIONS; FLUID FLOW; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; IRON ALLOYS; IRON BASE ALLOYS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OTHER ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; TRANSITION ELEMENT ALLOYS; TUBES