Published August 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

Use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging based measurements of inferior vena cava cross-sectional area in the diagnosis of pericardial constriction

  • 1. University of Toronto, University Health Network, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, Dept. of Medical Imaging, Toronto, Ontario (Canada)
  • 2. University of Toronto, University Health Network, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, Dept. of Cadriology, Toronto, Ontario (Canada)
  • 3. University of Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Toronto, Ontario (Canada)

Description

Purpose: To evaluate the value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based measurements of inferior vena cava (IVC) cross-sectional area in the diagnosis of pericardial constriction. Methods: Patients who had undergone cardiac MRI for evaluation of clinically suspected pericardial constriction were identified retrospectively. The diagnosis of pericardial constriction was established by clinical history, echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, intraoperative findings, and/or histopathology. Cross-sectional areas of the suprahepatic IVC and descending aorta were measured on a single axial steady-state free-precession (SSFP) image at the level of the esophageal hiatus in end-systole. Logistic regression and receiver-operating curve (ROC) analyses were performed. Results: Thirty-six patients were included; 50% (n = 18) had pericardial constriction. Mean age was 53.9 ± 15.3 years, and 72% (n = 26) were male. IVC area, ratio of IVC to aortic area, pericardial thickness, and presence of respirophasic septal shift were all significantly different between patients with constriction and those without (P < .001 for all). IVC to aortic area ratio had the highest odds ratio for the prediction of constriction (1070, 95% confidence interval [8.0-143051], P = .005). ROC analysis illustrated that IVC to aortic area ratio discriminated between those with and without constriction with an area under the curve of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [0.91-1.00]). Conclusions: In patients referred for cardiac MRI assessment of suspected pericardial constriction, measurement of suprahepatic IVC cross-sectional area may be useful in confirming the diagnosis of constriction when used in combination with other imaging findings, including pericardial thickness and respirophasic septal shift. (author)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2014.12.007

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Journal Volume
66
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 231-237
ISSN
0846-5371

INIS

Country of Publication
Canada
Country of Input or Organization
Canada
INIS RN
50018142
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
AORTA; ARTERIES; DIAGNOSIS; HEART; NMR IMAGING
Descriptors DEC
ARTERIES; BLOOD VESSELS; BODY; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; ORGANS

Optional Information

Notes
24 refs., 4 tabs., 3 figs.