Published April 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Turning lights into flights: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households

  • 1. Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Sussex Energy Group, SPRU (Science and Technology Policy Research), University of Sussex (United Kingdom)
  • 3. School of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University (United Kingdom)

Description

Energy efficiency improvements by households lead to rebound effects that offset the potential energy and emissions savings. Direct rebound effects result from increased demand for cheaper energy services, while indirect rebound effects result from increased demand for other goods and services that also require energy to provide. Research to date has focused upon the former, but both are important for climate change. This study estimates the combined direct and indirect rebound effects from seven measures that improve the energy efficiency of UK dwellings. The methodology is based upon estimates of the income elasticity and greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of 16 categories of household goods and services, and allows for the embodied emissions of the energy efficiency measures themselves, as well as the capital cost of the measures. Rebound effects are measured in GHG terms and relate to the adoption of these measures by an average UK household. The study finds that the rebound effects from these measures are typically in the range 5–15% and arise mostly from indirect effects. This is largely because expenditure on gas and electricity is more GHG-intensive than expenditure on other goods and services. However, the anticipated shift towards a low carbon electricity system in the UK may lead to much larger rebound effects. - Highlights: ► We estimate the direct and indirect rebound effects from energy efficiency improvements by UK households. ► We allow for the capital cost of the improvement, together with the emissions embodied in the relevant equipment. ► We find rebound effects to be relatively modest, in the range 5–15%. ► The anticipated shift towards a low carbon electricity system will lead to larger rebound effects

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.008

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.008;
PII
S0301-4215(12)01053-1;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
55
Journal Page Range
p. 234-250
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46025116
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
CAPITALIZED COST; CLIMATIC CHANGE; ECONOMIC ELASTICITY; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EXPENDITURES; GOODS AND SERVICES; GREENHOUSE GASES; HOUSEHOLDS; NATURAL GAS; PRICES; UNITED KINGDOM
Descriptors DEC
COST; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; EFFICIENCY; ENERGY SOURCES; EUROPE; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; WESTERN EUROPE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.