Published October 15, 2008 | Version v1
Journal article

Voting on the environment: Price or ideology? Evidence from Swiss referendums

  • 1. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, ENAC - INTER - REME, BP St. 16, 1015 Lausanne (Switzerland)
  • 2. Economics for the Environment Consultancy Ltd - EFTEC, 73-75 Mortimer Street, London, W1W 7SQ (United Kingdom)

Description

Studies on preferences for environmental quality usually posit that price and income explain most of the observed choices. Incorporating recent advances in the economics of non-selfish behavior into the traditional public choice approach, we argue that the willingness to contribute to public goods as well as social norms need to be taken into account when analyzing environmental voting outcomes. We study aggregate results of three ballot proposals in Switzerland put to vote in the year 2000 which foresaw different tax schemes on fossil energy. Our main results show that the aggregate level choice pattern is to be explained by income as well as structural attributes that make costs and benefits of the projects vary. More importantly, our results underline the importance of including variables pertaining to the notion of ideology, both in terms of statistical fit and obtaining unbiased estimates for price and income determinants. (author)

Availability note (English)

Available from Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.026

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Ecological Economics
Journal Volume
67
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 430-440
ISSN
0921-8009
CODEN
ECECEM

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
Netherlands
INIS RN
40002305
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
COST; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; INCOME; PRICES; PUBLIC OPINION; SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS; SWITZERLAND; TAXES
Descriptors DEC
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; EUROPE; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS; WESTERN EUROPE

Optional Information

Notes
Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved