Published July 1, 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Detection of herbicides in the urine of pet dogs following home lawn chemical application

  • 1. Purdue University Center for Cancer Research and Purdue Oncological Sciences Center, West Lafayette, IN (United States)
  • 2. Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN (United States)
  • 3. Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN (United States)
  • 4. Bindley Bioscience Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN (United States)
  • 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (United States)

Description

Exposure to herbicide-treated lawns has been associated with significantly higher bladder cancer risk in dogs. This work was performed to further characterize lawn chemical exposures in dogs, and to determine environmental factors associated with chemical residence time on grass. In addition to concern for canine health, a strong justification for the work was that dogs may serve as sentinels for potentially harmful environmental exposures in humans. Experimentally, herbicides [2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxypropionic acid (MCPP), dicamba] were applied to grass plots under different conditions (e.g., green, dry brown, wet, and recently mowed grass). Chemicals in dislodgeable residues were measured by LC-MS at 0.17, 1, 24, 48, 72 h post treatment. In a separate study, 2,4-D, MCPP, and dithiopyr concentrations were measured in the urine of dogs and in dislodgeable grass residues in households that applied or did not apply chemicals in the preceding 48 h. Chemicals were measured at 0, 24, and 48 h post application in treated households and at time 0 in untreated control households. Residence times of 2,4-D, MCPP, and dicamba were significantly prolonged (P < 0.05) on dry brown grass compared to green grass. Chemicals were detected in the urine of dogs in 14 of 25 households before lawn treatment, in 19 of 25 households after lawn treatment, and in 4 of 8 untreated households. Chemicals were commonly detected in grass residues from treated lawns, and from untreated lawns suggesting chemical drift from nearby treated areas. Thus dogs could be exposed to chemicals through contact with their own lawn (treated or contaminated through drift) or through contact with other grassy areas if they travel. The length of time to restrict a dog's access to treated lawns following treatment remains to be defined. Further study is indicated to assess the risks of herbicide exposure in humans and dogs. - Highlights: • Lawn chemicals were commonly detected on treated and "untreated" lawns. • The detection of lawn chemicals in the urine of pet dogs was widespread. • Lawn chemicals persisted on the grass for at least 48 h after application. • Chemicals persisted longer on grass under certain environmental conditions. • Dogs may serve as sentinels for human expsoures, and further study is justified

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.019

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.019;
PII
S0048-9697(13)00310-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
456-457
Journal Page Range
p. 34-41
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.