Comparison of new hybrid FEEMD-MLP, FEEMD-ANFIS, Wavelet Packet-MLP and Wavelet Packet-ANFIS for wind speed predictions
Creators
- 1. Institute of Automation, Faculty of Informatics and Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock 18119, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany)
- 2. Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track of Ministry of Education, School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, Hunan (China)
Description
Highlights: • Four algorithms [EMD/FEEMD/WD/WPD] are proposed for the wind speed decomposition. • Two new hybrid forecasting algorithms [FEEMD-MLP/ANFIS] are presented. • The contributions of the FEEMD/WPD algorithms are both significant. • The MLP has better forecasting performance than the ANFIS in these cases. • All the proposed hybrid algorithms are suitable for the wind speed predictions. - Abstract: The technology of wind speed prediction is important to guarantee the safety of wind power utilization. Compared to the single algorithms, the hybrid ones always have better performance in the wind speed predictions. In this paper, three most important decomposing algorithms [Wavelet Decomposition – WD/Wavelet Packet Decomposition – WPD/Empirical Mode Decomposition – EMD] and a latest decomposing algorithm [Fast Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition – FEEMD] are all adopted to realize the wind speed high-precision predictions with two representative networks [MLP Neural Network/ANFIS Neural Network]. Based on the hybrid forecasting framework, two new wind speed forecasting methods [FEEMD-MLP and FEEMD-ANFIS] are proposed. Additionally, a series of performance comparison is provided, which includes EMD-MLP, FEEMD-MLP, EDM-ANFIS, FEEMD-ANFIS, WD-MLP, WD-ANFIS, WPD-MLP and WPD-ANFIS. The aim of the study is to investigate the decomposing and forecasting performance of the different hybrid models. Two experimental results show that: (1) Due to the inclusion of the decomposing algorithms, the hybrid ANN algorithms have better performance than their corresponding single ANN algorithms; (2) the proposed new FEEMD-MLP hybrid model has the best performance in the three-step predictions while the WPD-MLP hybrid model has the best performance in the one-step predictions; (3) among the decomposing algorithms, the FEEMD and WPD have better performance than the EMD and WD, respectively; (4) in the forecasting neural networks, the MLP has better performance than the ANFIS; and (5) all of the proposed hybrid algorithms are suitable for the wind speed predictions
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.060Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.060;
- PII
- S0196-8904(14)00861-9;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Journal Volume
- 89
- Journal Issue
- Complete
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1-11
- ISSN
- 0196-8904
- CODEN
- ECMADL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 46106385
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S97: MATHEMATICAL METHODS AND COMPUTING;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; ALGORITHMS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; FUZZY LOGIC; NEURAL NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY; WIND; WIND POWER
- Descriptors DEC
- ENERGY SOURCES; EVALUATION; FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; POWER; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SIMULATION
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.