Published May 2006 | Version v1
Journal article

In vivo basal ganglia volumetry through application of NURBS models to MR images

  • 1. University of Messina, Department of Biomorphology and Biotechnologies, Messina (Italy)
  • 2. University of Messina, Department of Neurosurgery, Messina (Italy)
  • 3. University of Messina, Study and Treatment Centre for Long-Stay Neurological Patients, Section of Neuroradiology, Messina (Italy)
  • 4. University of Padua, Department of Diagnostic Sciences and Special Therapy, Section of Neuroradiology, Padua (Italy)
  • 5. University of Padua, Department of Human Anatomy and Physiology, Section of Anatomy, Padua (Italy)

Description

Volumetry of basal ganglia (BG) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a sensitive marker in differential diagnosis of BG disorders. The non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) surfaces are mathematical representations of three-dimensional structures which have recently been applied in volumetric studies. In this study, a volumetric evaluation of BG based on NURBS was performed in 35 right-handed volunteers. We aimed to compare and validate this technique with respect to manual MRI volumetry and evaluate possible side differences between these structures. Intra- and interobserver biases less than 1.5% demonstrated the method's stability. The mean percentage differences between NURBS and manual methods were less than 1% for all the structures considered; however, the internal segments of the globus pallidus showed a mean percentage difference of about 1.7%. Rightward asymmetry was found for the caudate nucleus (mean±SD 3.20±0.20 cm3 vs. 3.10±0.19 cm3, P<0.001) for both its head (1.44±0.10 cm3 vs. 1.41±0.09 cm3, P<0.01) and its body/tail (1.73±0.11 cm3 and 1.68±0.12 cm3, P<0.01), and for the globus pallidus (1.23±0.08 cm3 and 1.18±0.09 cm3, P<0.001) for both the internal (0.33±0.05 cm3 vs. 0.31±0.05 cm3, P<0.01) and external (0.90±0.05 cm3 vs. 0.86±0.05 cm3, P<0.001) segments. No volumetric side differences were found for the putamen (3.43±0.14 cm3 vs. 3.39±0.17 cm3, P>0.05). The rightward asymmetry of the BG may be ascribed to the predominant use of the right hand. In conclusion, NURBS is an accurate and reliable method for quantitative volumetry of nervous structures. It offers the advantage of giving a three-dimensional representation of the structures examined. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-005-0041-4

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Neuroradiology
Journal Volume
48
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 338-345
ISSN
0028-3940
CODEN
NRDYAB

INIS

Country of Publication
Germany
Country of Input or Organization
Germany
INIS RN
37071508
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; GANGLIONS; IN VIVO; NMR IMAGING; THREE-DIMENSIONAL CALCULATIONS; VOLUME
Descriptors DEC
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; EVALUATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM