Low-carbon strategies towards 2050: Comparing ex-ante policy evaluation studies and national planning processes in Europe
Creators
- 1. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague (Netherlands)
- 2. Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht (Netherlands)
- 3. CNRS, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris (France)
- 4. GAEL-EDDEN, Laboratoire Économie du développement durable et de l'énergie, Grenoble (France)
- 5. Öko-Institut, Berlin (Germany)
- 6. Danish Energy Agency, Copenhagen (Denmark)
- 7. Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung (ISI), Karlsruhe (Germany)
- 8. Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex, Brighton (United Kingdom)
- 9. UK Energy Research Center (UKERC), London (United Kingdom)
Description
Highlights: • This study looks into ex-ante strategies towards 2050 on the EU Member State level. • A high variety exists in establishing, governing and evaluating long-term strategies. • National ex-ante evaluation processes predominantly focused on domestic action. • Cross-border exchanges and participatory modelling could lead to more durable solutions. - Abstract: The European Union (EU) is committed to reducing its greenhouse gas (GHG) emission levels by 80%–95% in 2050 compared to 1990 levels. Various approaches have been developed to secure and evaluate the progress made towards this objective. To gain insights into how EU Member States are aligning to this collective long-term objective, we systematically compare the planning and ex-ante evaluation processes for five EU countries (respectively Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom). The comparative analysis consists of a qualitative comparison of (1) the governance of long-term policy planning and evaluation processes, (2) the national arrangement for quantitative (model-based) ex-ante policy evaluation and (3) the national arrangement for qualitative ex-ante policy evaluation (stakeholder participation). In a second step we conduct a quantitative comparison of national model-based ex-ante evaluation studies to assess the relative differences between the considered routes and the differences across the various countries. Although the five Member States plan policies along the same EU objective, we find a high diversity in how long-term commitments are established, governed and evaluated on the national level. Model-based scenario analyses are commonly used to explore and evaluate the possible national routes towards the EU 2050 objective. However, as these processes mostly concentrate on domestic action, they pay little attention to how domestic policies are affected by, or affecting, other international activities throughout Europe. Hence, current findings suggest that cross-border collaboration and stakeholder participation could further strengthen the analytical understanding of required transformative change in Europe and subsequently lead to a more durable long-term solution over time.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.022Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.022;
- PII
- S1462-9011(17)30232-0;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Environmental Science and Policy
- Journal Volume
- 78
- Journal Page Range
- p. 89-96
- ISSN
- 1462-9011
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 49057708
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DENMARK; EUROPEAN UNION; FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY; FOREIGN POLICY; FRANCE; GREENHOUSE GASES; MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS; MEMBER STATES; NETHERLANDS; PLANNING; SIMULATION; UNITED KINGDOM
- Descriptors DEC
- DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; EUROPE; EVALUATION; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; POLLUTION ABATEMENT; SCANDINAVIA; WESTERN EUROPE
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.