Published April 1993 | Version v1
Journal article

The effects of interim flow operations from Glen Canyon Dam on Colorado River sand bars in the Grand Canyon, Arizona

  • 1. Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States). Geology Dept.
  • 2. Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States). NPS Cooperative Parks Studies Unit
  • 3. Glen Canyon Environmental Studies, Flagstaff, AZ (United States)

Description

Discharges from Glen Canyon Dam (GCD) affect the geomorphology and stability of downstream alluvial sediment deposits. To protect downstream resources, the US DOI mandated interim flow criteria (IFC) on 1 August, 1991. The IFC consist of reduced daily fluctuations (226--566 m3/s) and reduced ramping rates (42.5--57 m3/s/hr), the primary objective of which is to maintain sediment storage in the river system by minimizing sediment transport. This study was initiated to determine the effectiveness of the IFC in achieving this objective. The authors examined whether reduced daily fluctuations lead to subaerial sand bar erosion and increased subaqueous sediment storage. They collected and analyzed topographic and bathymetric survey data from sand bars throughout the Colorado River corridor in Sept/Oct, 1991 and in Oct/Nov, 1992 to compare changes in sand bar morphology. They examined changing topography due to GCD operation in what they termed the hydrologically active zone (HAZ), that portion of the sand bar exposed to daily dam operations (142--900 m3/s stage elevations). Volumes within the HAZ and profiles across this zone were generated from these sediment deposits. Their preliminary results show that, in general, erosion of sediment at higher bar elevations was coincident with deposition along lower parts of the bar platform. The observed response to IFC elevation in order to maintain sediment deposits for Colorado River corridor bio-diversity (e.g., fisheries habitats). 88% of sand bars that showed significant volume gain were preceded by significant volume loss, implying that antecedent conditions are an important factor in sand bar response to GCD operations. Sediment transport capacity was reduced as evidenced by increased sediment storage in recirculation zones and sediment infilling of eddy return channels. The authors conclude that IFC are achieving their primary objective of maintaining sediment storage within the river corridor

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs
Journal Volume
25
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 60.
ISSN
0016-7592
CODEN
GAAPBC

Conference

Title
89. annual meeting of the Cordilleran Section; 46. annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain Section of the Geological Society of America (GSA).
Dates
19-21 May 1993.
Place
Reno, NV (United States).

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
25052145
Subject category
S13: HYDRO ENERGY; S58: GEOSCIENCES; S58: GEOSCIENCES;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS; ARIZONA; COLORADO RIVER; DAMS; DEPOSITION; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS; EROSION; GEOMORPHOLOGY; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANTS
Descriptors DEC
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; GEOLOGIC DEPOSITS; GEOLOGY; NORTH AMERICA; POWER PLANTS; RIVERS; SURFACE WATERS; USA

Optional Information

Secondary number(s)
CONF-9305259--.