Published November 2011
| Version v1
Journal article
Comparison of PET performance in clinical examination among PET facilities
- 1. Iwate Medical Univ., Cyclotron Research Center, Takizawa, Iwate (Japan)
- 2. Tohoku Univ., School of Engineering, Sendai, Miyagi (Japan)
Description
There are several guidelines for positron emission tomography (PET) performance evaluation. Most of them require a lot of time and strict conditioning. Here we selected 5 items from the guidelines with some adjustments on which we evaluate and compare PET performances of seven facilities for the purpose of clarifying why and how PET quantitative values are different among facilities. The results show that the data vary even with the same type of PET machine when the image reconstruction method is different. This suggests that the terms of data reconstruction have to be considered as well as the difference of PET performance when we refer PET data of other facilities for clinical purpose. (author)
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.3769/radioisotopes.60.473Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radioisotopes (Tokyo)
- Journal Volume
- 60
- Journal Issue
- 11
- Journal Page Range
- p. 473-486
- ISSN
- 0033-8303
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Japan
- Country of Input or Organization
- Japan
- INIS RN
- 43047552
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- BRAIN; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE; IMAGE PROCESSING; NECK; PERFORMANCE TESTING; PHANTOMS; POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RECOMMENDATIONS; SCATTERING; SENSITIVITY; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL CALCULATIONS; VOLUME
- Descriptors DEC
- ANTIMETABOLITES; BODY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DRUGS; EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MOCKUP; NERVOUS SYSTEM; ORGANS; PROCESSING; RESOLUTION; STRUCTURAL MODELS; TESTING; TOMOGRAPHY