Published September 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Dual mixed refrigerant LNG process: Uncertainty quantification and dimensional reduction sensitivity analysis

  • 1. School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-749 (Korea, Republic of)
  • 2. Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore 487372 (Singapore)
  • 3. Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506 (United States)
  • 4. Gas Plant R&D Center, Korea Gas Corporation, Incheon 406-130 (Korea, Republic of)

Description

Highlights: • Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for LNG process. • Standard Monte Carlo (MC) method is utilized. • Relative percentage of the Sobol total effect indices for DMR LNG process. • Probability distribution of the approach temperature for DMR liquefaction process. • Global sensitivity analysis with less computational effort. -- Abstract: The dual mixed refrigerant (DMR) liquefaction process is complicated and sensitive compared to the competitive propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant liquefied natural gas (LNG) process. When any uncertainty is introduced to the process operation conditions, it is necessary for the DMR process to be re-optimized to maintain efficient operation at a minimal cost. However, in actual operation, re-optimization is a challenging task when the process operational input variables are varied, typically owing to the lack of information regarding the nature, impact, and levels of uncertainty. Within this context, this study investigates the uncertainty levels in the overall energy consumption and minimum internal temperature approach (MITA) inside LNG heat exchangers with variations in the operational variables of the DMR processes. Moreover, a global sensitivity analysis is conducted to identify the influence of random inputs on the process performance parameters. The required energy is significantly influenced by the variations in the variables in the cold mixed refrigerant (approximately 63%), while changes in the warm mixed refrigerant (WMR) section only slightly affect the uncertainty of the required specific energy. Furthermore, the probability distribution of the approach temperature (MITA1) inside the WMR exchanger is mainly affected by changes in the compositions of methane, ethane, and propane, as well as the high pressure of the cold mixed refrigerant (approximately 97%). Conversely, the flow rate of ethane and low pressure of the WMR significantly affect the uncertainty of the approach temperature (MITA2) inside the cold mixed refrigerant exchanger.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.004;
PII
S030626191930858X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Energy
Journal Volume
250
Journal Page Range
p. 1446-1456
ISSN
0306-2619
CODEN
APENDX

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.