Rethinking energy security and services in practice: National vulnerability and three energy pathways in Tajikistan
- 1. School of Arts and Sciences and Mountain Societies Research Institute, University of Central Asia, 155 Qimatsho Imatsho Street, Khorog, GBAO 736000 (Tajikistan)
- 2. Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, 108 Fernow Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 (United States)
- 3. Sussex Energy Group, Center on Innovation and Energy Demand, Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex, Jubilee Building, Room 367, Falmer, East Sussex BN1 9SL (United Kingdom)
- 4. Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, 122 Fernow Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 (United States)
Description
Highlights: • A novel vulnerability approach is applied to energy security assessment. • Key vulnerabilities in energy system are assessed in case of Tajikistan. • Three major pathways to achieve energy security in Tajikistan are evaluated. • A paradigm shift from energy sources to services is recommended to improve access. - Abstract: To help answer questions about availability, accessibility, sustainability and other dimensions of energy security, the vulnerability approach concentrates the attention of policymakers on the assessment of risks associated with natural, technical, political and economic factors. This understanding, combined with a focus on energy services (e.g. lighting, heating, telecommunications, mobility, etc.) helps to prioritize actions to achieve the goal of energy security. This paper conceptualizes energy security as low vulnerability of vital energy systems and sustained provision of modern energy services. Taking Tajikistan as a case, this paper highlights key vulnerabilities including neglect of environmental conditions, insufficient energy production capacity, unreliable and expensive energy imports, dwindling power infrastructure causing technical and economic losses, inadequate transparency in the power sector, lack of regional cooperation in energy and water resources sharing, and inadequate financial resources to address these challenges. Three major proposals presented by the World Bank, the United Nations Development Program, and the Government of Tajikistan to achieve energy security in Tajikistan are evaluated. Specifically, they lack a focus on energy services and therefore overlook people's socio-cultural context and appropriate energy needs. This paper highlights energy services as critical to people's wellbeing and socio-economic development.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.058Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.058;
- PII
- S0301421517308030;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 114
- Journal Page Range
- p. 39-50
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 51037117
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY SECURITY; ENERGY SOURCES; ENERGY SYSTEMS; IMPORTS; REGIONAL COOPERATION; SUSTAINABILITY; TAJIKISTAN; VULNERABILITY; WATER RESOURCES
- Descriptors DEC
- ASIA; COOPERATION; RESOURCES; TRADE
Optional Information
- Notes
- © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.