Long-term dynamics of investment decisions in electricity markets with variable renewables development and adequacy objectives
Description
In liberalised electricity systems, power markets are expected to ensure the long-term coordination of investments in order to guarantee security of supply, sustainability and competitiveness. In the reference energy-only market, it relies on the ability of power markets - where the hourly price is aligned with the marginal cost of the system - to provide an adequate price-signal for investors. However, in practice, questions have been raised about its ability to trigger investments in Low-Carbon Technologies (LCT) including in particular Renewable Energy Sources of Electricity (RES-E), and its ability to ensure capacity adequacy. After a characterisation of these market failures, this dissertation tackles the two research topics within a methodological framework based on a System Dynamics model developed to simulate private investment decisions in power markets. First, the results show that substituting out-of-market support mechanisms for RES-E by market-based investments helped by the sole implementation of a carbon price appears as a feasible solution to trigger RES-E development providing that there is a political commitment on a high carbon price. Second, it also appears that the energy-only market with price cap is ineffective to ensure capacity adequacy in a context of mature markets with conventional thermal power plants under transition paths which involve a stable electricity demand thank to energy efficiency efforts and the exogenous development of RES-E thanks to support mechanisms in the absence of a high and fixed carbon price. Adding a capacity market or removing the price cap both bring benefits in terms of Loss Of Load Expectation (LOLE) and social welfare. Moreover, considering two various energy transition scenarios and different assumptions about the risk aversion of private investors, the capacity market is identified as the best option for regulators among the considered market designs. (author)
Abstract (French)
Les marches electriques liberalises sont supposes assurer la coordination de long-terme des investissements afin de garantir securite d'approvisionnement, viabilite et competitivite. Dans le modele de reference energy-only, la formation des prix par alignement sur le cout variable de l'equipement marginal sur les marches horaires successifs fournit un signal prix pour les investisseurs. Cependant, en pratique, ce modele est remis en question quant a sa capacite a declencher des investissements dans les technologies bas-carbone et en particulier les energies renouvelables (EnR) et quant a sa capacite a garantir la securite d'approvisionnement. Cette these cherche d'abord a caracteriser ces deux defaillances de marche puis s'interesse a differentes solutions pour faire face a chacune d'entre elles. Pour cela, la reflexion s'appuie sur un modele en System Dynamics developpe afin de simuler les investissements dans les marches electriques. Les resultats montrent que le remplacement des mecanismes de support hors marche par des investissements par le marche avec l'aide d'un prix du carbone apparait comme une solution pour declencher le developpement des EnR a condition d'un engagement politique fort en faveur d'un prix du carbone eleve. Il apparait aussi que le marche energy-only avec des prix plafonnes ne parvient pas a assurer l'adequation en capacite dans un contexte de marches electriques matures avec des centrales thermiques conventionnelles faisant face a des scenarios de transition energetique. L'ajout d'un marche de capacite ou la suppression du plafond de prix permettent une amelioration en termes de nombre d'heure de delestage et de bien-etre collectif. De plus, en considerant deux scenarios de transition energetique et plusieurs hypotheses sur l'aversion au risque des investisseurs prives, le marche de capacite apparait comme le meilleur choix pour le regulateur parmi les architectures de marche considerees. (auteur)
Files
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Imprint Pagination
- 315 p.
- Report number
- FRNC-TH--10009
INIS
- Country of Publication
- France
- Country of Input or Organization
- France
- INIS RN
- 49041911
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S24: POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Thesis
- Descriptors DEI
- CAPACITY; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DEMAND FACTORS; DEREGULATION; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ENERGY SOURCE DEVELOPMENT; INVESTMENT; LOAD MANAGEMENT; MARKET; OUTAGES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUPPLY AND DEMAND; WHOLESALE PRICES; WIND POWER
- Descriptors DEC
- CALCULATION METHODS; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; ENERGY SOURCES; INDUSTRY; MANAGEMENT; POWER; PRICES; PUBLIC UTILITIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SIMULATION
Optional Information
- Notes
- [290 refs.]; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses