Published February 2006 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparison of radiology residency programs in ten countries

  • 1. John Radcliffe Hospital, Department of Radiology, Oxford (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Ridge Meadow Hospital, Department of Medical Imaging, Maple Ridge, BC (Canada)

Description

The purpose of our study was to compare various aspects of radiology training schemes in ten countries. A questionnaire was sent to senior residents in the UK, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Italy, Egypt, India, Malaysia and Greece. The questions concerned length of training, required pre-training experience, the organization of the training scheme, teaching, resources, stages at which residents can independently perform and report examinations, fellowships, and progression to jobs. A wide variety of training, ranging from highly scheduled programs with detailed aims and objectives, to self-learning occurs across the world. Examinations and assessments are also variable. There are lessons to be learned from varying practices; more exchanges of ideas should be encouraged. In view of the ''internationalization'' of radiology services and the variation in training styles an international qualification for quality assurance purposes may be desirable. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2635-3

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
16
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 437-444
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3

INIS

Country of Publication
Germany
Country of Input or Organization
Germany
INIS RN
37026432
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES; MEDICAL PERSONNEL
Descriptors DEC
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; EVALUATION; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PERSONNEL; RADIOLOGY