Published September 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives

  • 1. Swedish Center for Resource Recovery Department of Biotechnology, University of Borås, Borås (Sweden)
  • 2. College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100 (China)
  • 3. Key Laboratory of Basic Pharmacology of Ministry of Education, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou (China)
  • 4. Department of Environmental Science, SRM University-AP, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh (India)

Description

Highlights: • Improper disposal of organic manure could cause unwanted ecological damage. • Recent biorefinery models to recover energy and nutrients are addressed. • Biological treatment of organic manure remains the predominant recycling approach. • Limited knowledge of the potential of biorefinery approaches still exist. • Successful implementation of biorefineries requires policy and social support. -- Abstract: Total livestock emissions account for up to 14.5% of man-made greenhouse gas emissions. Counteractive measures, such as circular economy concepts and negative emission technologies are necessary to limit global warming below 1.5 °C. Possible treatment options for organic manure include anaerobic digestion, combustion, gasification, hydrothermal liquefaction and composting. The choice of treatment varies depending on the economics, the requirement of a specific product, and sociocultural factors. Commercialization of these treatments needs a blend of appropriate technology, feasible economics, policy support and agreeable socio-cultural conditions. Key findings of this study include the following: 1. Increasing scientific awareness about manure management and treatment; 2. Building a sustainable cooperative model to commercialize technologies; 3. Creating a market for manure recycling products; 4. The role of policy in supporting technologies and consumers; and 5. The codigestion of substrates for better efficacy. Current trends show minimal actions in place as opposed to the high-rate of acceleration that is necessary.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.017;
PII
S1364032119303235;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Journal Volume
111
Journal Page Range
p. 115-131
ISSN
1364-0321

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55020177
Subject category
S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
Descriptors DEI
ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY; COMPOSTING; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GASIFICATION; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIQUEFACTION
Descriptors DEC
BIOCONVERSION; CLIMATIC CHANGE; DIGESTION; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; MANAGEMENT; PROCESSING; THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE PROCESSING

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.