Published August 1989
| Version v1
Journal article
A case for nuclear power: economic and environmental argument for going nuclear
Creators
Description
Economic and environmental arguments are presented showing how Australia could benefit from the enormous financial rewards and high technology expertise stemming from full involvement in the nuclear fuel cycle, while making a significant global contribution to the elimation of greenhouse gases. The Northern Territory is viewed as the logical choice for establishing an integrated nuclear fuel cycle industry. 2 tabs, diagrams
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Mining Review
- Journal Issue
- p. 20-24
- Series
- Min. Rev.
- CODEN
- MNRVA
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Australia
- Country of Input or Organization
- Australia
- INIS RN
- 21059686
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S11: NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS;
- Descriptors DEI
- ANSTO; AUSTRALIA; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; ENERGY DENSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL CYCLE; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; ISOTOPE SEPARATION PLANTS; MARKET; NORTHERN TERRITORY; NUCLEAR FUELS; NUCLEAR POWER; ORE ENRICHMENT; POWER GENERATION; PUBLIC OPINION; RESEARCH PROGRAMS; SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS; URANIUM; URANIUM REQUIREMENTS
- Descriptors DEC
- ACTINIDES; AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIAN ORGANIZATIONS; DEMAND; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ELEMENTS; ENERGY SOURCES; EVALUATION; FUELS; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; MATERIALS; METALS; NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; ORE PROCESSING; POWER; REACTOR MATERIALS; SEPARATION PROCESSES