Portfolio diversification in energy markets
Creators
- 1. Department of Economics at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB (Canada)
Description
This paper's results indicate that futures for crude oil, natural gas and unleaded gasoline fail to enhance the performance of representative energy stocks in terms of return to risk, but do decrease the overall level of risk exposure borne by passive equity investors. Our findings suggest that futures contracts on energy commodities are valuable to market participants with an interest in hedging against price fluctuations in energy markets by buy-and-hold strategies. However, this conclusion is reversed when one takes the perspective of traders whose core interests can be better approximated through the return to risk-bearing. In fact, this paper documents that return-to-risk maximizing agents are unlikely to profit from trading energy futures in addition to energy stocks. Moreover, futures for energy commodities fail to offer significant diversification gains with respect to energy stocks once investors adopt simple dynamic trading strategies that rely on readily available pricing information. (author)
Availability note (English)
Available from Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.05.015Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Economics
- Journal Volume
- 32
- Journal Issue
- 2
- Journal Page Range
- p. 257-268
- ISSN
- 0140-9883
- CODEN
- EECODR
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- United Kingdom
- INIS RN
- 41071126
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- CONTRACTS; DIVERSIFICATION; INVENTORIES; MARKET; NATURAL GAS; PETROLEUM; PRICES; UNLEADED GASOLINE
- Descriptors DEC
- ENERGY SOURCES; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; GASOLINE; LIQUID FUELS; PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
Optional Information
- Notes
- Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved