Published March 2010 | Version v1
Journal article

Portfolio diversification in energy markets

  • 1. Department of Economics at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB (Canada)

Description

This paper's results indicate that futures for crude oil, natural gas and unleaded gasoline fail to enhance the performance of representative energy stocks in terms of return to risk, but do decrease the overall level of risk exposure borne by passive equity investors. Our findings suggest that futures contracts on energy commodities are valuable to market participants with an interest in hedging against price fluctuations in energy markets by buy-and-hold strategies. However, this conclusion is reversed when one takes the perspective of traders whose core interests can be better approximated through the return to risk-bearing. In fact, this paper documents that return-to-risk maximizing agents are unlikely to profit from trading energy futures in addition to energy stocks. Moreover, futures for energy commodities fail to offer significant diversification gains with respect to energy stocks once investors adopt simple dynamic trading strategies that rely on readily available pricing information. (author)

Availability note (English)

Available from Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.05.015

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Economics
Journal Volume
32
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 257-268
ISSN
0140-9883
CODEN
EECODR

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
United Kingdom
INIS RN
41071126
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
CONTRACTS; DIVERSIFICATION; INVENTORIES; MARKET; NATURAL GAS; PETROLEUM; PRICES; UNLEADED GASOLINE
Descriptors DEC
ENERGY SOURCES; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; GASOLINE; LIQUID FUELS; PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

Optional Information

Notes
Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved