Published May 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction - joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group

  • 1. Cairo University Hospitals, Genitourinary and Pelvic Floor MR Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo (Egypt)
  • 2. University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Duesseldorf (Germany)
  • 3. Sapienza University Rome, Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome (Italy)
  • 4. University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Department of Radiology, Salzburg (Austria)
  • 5. Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Radiology Dea, Umberto I Hospital, Rome (Italy)
  • 6. Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Radiological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome (Italy)
  • 7. Triemli Hospital Zurich, Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Zurich (Switzerland)

Description

To develop recommendations that can be used as guidance for standardized approach regarding indications, patient preparation, sequences acquisition, interpretation and reporting of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis and grading of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). The technique included critical literature between 1993 and 2013 and expert consensus about MRI protocols by the pelvic floor-imaging working group of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) from one Egyptian and seven European institutions. Data collection and analysis were achieved in 5 consecutive steps. Eighty-two items were scored to be eligible for further analysis and scaling. Agreement of at least 80 % was defined as consensus finding. Consensus was reached for 88 % of 82 items. Recommended reporting template should include two main sections for measurements and grading. The pubococcygeal line (PCL) is recommended as the reference line to measure pelvic organ prolapse. The recommended grading scheme is the ''Rule of three'' for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), while a rectocele and ARJ descent each has its specific grading system. This literature review and expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidance for MR imaging and reporting of PFD. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4471-7

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
27
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 2067-2085
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3