Published November 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Part II – The effect of data on waste behaviour: The South African waste information system

  • 1. University of KwaZulu–Natal, CRECHE – Centre for Research in Environmental, Coastal and Hydrological Engineering, School of Engineering, Durban 4041 (South Africa)
  • 2. CSIR, Natural Resources and the Environment, PO Box 395, Pretoria 0001 (South Africa)
  • 3. University of KwaZulu–Natal, School of Development Studies, Durban 4041 (South Africa)
  • 4. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth 6031 (South Africa)

Description

Highlights: ► This empirical study explores the relationship between data and resultant waste knowledge. ► The study shows that "Experience, Data and Theory" account for 54.1% of the variance in knowledge. ► A strategic framework for Municipalities emerged from this study. - Abstract: Combining the process of learning and the theory of planned behaviour into a new theoretical framework provides an opportunity to explore the impact of data on waste behaviour, and consequently on waste management, in South Africa. Fitting the data to the theoretical framework shows that there are only three constructs which have a significant effect on behaviour, viz experience, knowledge, and perceived behavioural control (PBC). Knowledge has a significant influence on all three of the antecedents to behavioural intention (attitude, subjective norm and PBC). However, it is PBC, and not intention, that has the greatest influence on waste behaviour. While respondents may have an intention to act, this intention does not always manifest as actual waste behaviour, suggesting limited volitional control. The theoretical framework accounts for 53.7% of the variance in behaviour, suggesting significant external influences on behaviour not accounted for in the framework. While the theoretical model remains the same, respondents in public and private organisations represent two statistically significant sub-groups in the data set. The theoretical framework accounts for 47.8% of the variance in behaviour of respondents in public waste organisations and 57.6% of the variance in behaviour of respondents in private organisations. The results suggest that respondents in public and private waste organisations are subject to different structural forces that shape knowledge, intention, and resultant waste behaviour.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.018

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.018;
PII
S0956-053X(12)00227-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Waste Management
Journal Volume
32
Journal Issue
11
Journal Page Range
p. 2163-2176
ISSN
0956-053X
CODEN
WAMAE2

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44048621
Subject category
S12: MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES; S97: MATHEMATICAL METHODS AND COMPUTING;
Descriptors DEI
ATTITUDES; CONTROL; DATA ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOUTH AFRICA; WASTE MANAGEMENT
Descriptors DEC
AFRICA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; MANAGEMENT

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.