Published January 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Evaluation of TL and OSL responses of CaF2:Tm for electron beam processing dosimetry

  • 1. Departamento de Energia Nuclear, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (DEN/UFPE), Recife, PE (Brazil)
  • 2. Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares, Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear (IPEN-CNEN/SP), São Paulo, SP (Brazil)

Description

Highlights: • TL and IRSL responses of CaF2:Tm for electron beam processing are linear up to 6 kGy. • TL and IRSL responses of CaF2:Tm are dependent on the dose rate between 2 and 8 kGy/s. • Peak-shaped CW-IRSL curves are obtained under termal assistance instead of the normal monotonic decays. The thermoluminescence (TL) and infrared stimulated luminescence (IRSL) responses of in-house produced CaF2:Tm dosimeters are investigated in this work, envisaging their application in electron beam (EB) radiation processing. The irradiations were performed at an industrial EB accelerator (1.5 MeV) covering a dose rate range of 2–8 kGy/s and dose up to 10 kGy. In general, the TL glow curves display four peaks, termed as peaks 2, 3, 4, and 5, corresponding to temperatures at ~150, 200, 240, and 300 °C, respectively. The intensity of the low-temperature peaks (2 and 3) grows with the dose, while the others remain constant (saturated). Nevertheless, an evident dose effect on the glow curves manifests in decreased peak3/peak2 ratio with increasing doses. The CW-IRSL curves exhibit similar patterns with an initial signal increase, followed by an exponential decay. Instead of the normal monotonic decays, these peak-shaped curves might be due to the charge capture competition between empty shallow traps and recombination centers. Both TL and IRSL intensities increase linearly with doses up to 6 kGy, and for higher doses, they become sub-linear with a saturation trend around 10 kGy. Another common feature of TL/IRSL response is its dose rate dependence, being more sensitive at higher dose rates. Despite being dose-rate dependent, the CaF2:Tm dosimeters might be suitable for EB processing dosimetry. However, for their use as routine dosimeters, relevant dosimetric characteristics, such as fading and response reproducibility, have to be investigated. Work in this direction is underway.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2020.106512

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radmeas.2020.106512;
PII
S1350448720302845;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Measurements
Journal Volume
140
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
1350-4487
CODEN
RMEAEP

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.