Published July 31, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Atomic force microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy evaluation of adhesion and nanostructure of thin Cr films

  • 1. Institute of Materials Science of Kaunas University of Technology, Savanorių 271, LT-3009 Kaunas (Lithuania)
  • 2. Department of Chemical/Biochemical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 (United States)
  • 3. Department of Chemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 (United States)

Description

Chromium (Cr) thin films were deposited on float glass using electron beam (e-beam) physical vapor deposition and radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering techniques. Surface morphology of these Cr films was studied using atomic force microscopy (AFM). The e-beam deposited Cr films consisted of isolated surface mounds while in RF sputtered samples, these mounds combined to form larger islands. Lower surface adhesive properties were observed for e-beam deposited films, as determined from AFM force–distance curves, presumably due to the nanostructural differences. Similar amounts of adsorbed atmospheric carbonaceous contaminants and water vapor were detected on samples deposited using both methods with e-beam deposited samples having additional carbide species, as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data. The dominant crystallographic plane in both e-beam deposited and RF sputtered Cr thin films was (110) of body-centered cubic Cr metal structure as determined from X-ray diffraction data. Weak (211) reflection was also observed in RF sputtered samples and was attributed to a different thin Cr film condensation and growth mechanism which resulted in nanostructural differences between films deposited using two different methods. - Highlights: ► Cr thin films were deposited on glass using different vacuum deposition methods. ► Surface morphological, chemical, adhesive and structural properties were studied. ► The e-beam deposited Cr thin films consisted of isolated surface mounds. ► In RF magnetron sputtered samples, surface mounds combined to form larger islands. ► Variations in surface adhesive force were due to nanostructural differences.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2012.05.065

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.tsf.2012.05.065;
PII
S0040-6090(12)00666-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Thin Solid Films
Journal Volume
520
Journal Issue
19
Journal Page Range
p. 6328-6333
ISSN
0040-6090
CODEN
THSFAP

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.