Published June 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Shear wave profiles from surface wave inversion: the impact of uncertainty on seismic site response analysis

  • 1. Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova (Italy)

Description

Inversion is a critical step in all geophysical techniques, and is generally fraught with ill-posedness. In the case of seismic surface wave studies, the inverse problem can lead to different equivalent subsoil models and consequently to different local seismic response analyses. This can have a large impact on an earthquake engineering design. In this paper, we discuss the consequences of non-uniqueness of surface wave inversion on seismic responses, with both numerical and experimental data. Our goal is to evaluate the consequences on common seismic response analysis in the case of different impedance contrast conditions. We verify the implications of inversion uncertainty, and consequently of data information content, on realistic local site responses. A stochastic process is used to generate a set of 1D shear wave velocity profiles from several specific subsurface models. All these profiles are characterized as being equivalent, i.e. their responses, in terms of a dispersion curve, are compatible with the uncertainty in the same surface wave data. The generated 1D shear velocity models are then subjected to a conventional one-dimensional seismic ground response analysis using a realistic input motion. While recent analyses claim that the consequences of surface wave inversion uncertainties are very limited, our test points out that a relationship exists between inversion confidence and seismic responses in different subsoils. In the case of regular and relatively smooth increase of shear wave velocities with depth, as is usual in sedimentary plains, our results show that the choice of a specific model among equivalent solutions strongly influences the seismic response. On the other hand, when the shallow subsoil is characterized by a strong impedance contrast (thus revealing a characteristic soil resonance period), as is common in the presence of a shallow bedrock, equivalent solutions provide practically the same seismic amplification, especially in the frequency range of engineering interest

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/8/2/004

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1088/1742-2132/8/2/004;
PII
S1742-2132(11)53205-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering (Online)
Journal Volume
8
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 162-174
ISSN
1742-2140

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44125704
Subject category
S58: GEOSCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
AMPLIFICATION; EARTHQUAKES; FREQUENCY RANGE; IMPEDANCE; SEISMIC SURFACE WAVES; SHEAR; SOILS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; VELOCITY; WAVE PROPAGATION
Descriptors DEC
SEISMIC EVENTS; SEISMIC WAVES