Captive power, market access and macroeconomic performance: Reforming the Bangladesh electricity sector
Creators
- 1. School of Business and Economics, North South University, Dhaka 1229 (Bangladesh)
- 2. Copenhagen School of Energy Infrastructure (CSEI), Department of Economics, Copenhagen Business School (Denmark)
- 3. Durham University Business School and Durham Energy Institute, Mill Hill Lane, Durham DH1 3LB (United Kingdom)
- 4. Durham University Business School, Mill Hill Lane, Durham DH1 3LB (United Kingdom)
- 5. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam 781039 (India)
Description
Highlights: • CPPs provide privately sourced electricity to the Bangladeshi industrial sector. • CPPs are required to sell electricity surplus, but there is no evidence of trading. • We apply a DSGE model to analyse the impact of connecting CPPs to the national grid. • Steady-state industrial output, GDP, and household consumption decrease as a result. • Market distortions need to be removed before implementing structural policies. Integrating the captive capacity with the on-grid supply has been advocated as a way to improve resource utilization in the electricity market in developing and emerging countries. Despite many countries granting Captive Power Plants (CPPs) access to the grid, integration may still be hindered by other barriers to entry. In Bangladesh, CPPs are required to sell their electricity surplus, but there is no evidence of trading with the national grid, mostly due to high connectivity costs. In this paper we develop and estimate a fit-for-purpose Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model to examine the effects of the Bangladeshi CPPs connecting to the national grid and selling their surplus at regulated prices. The model parameters are set through a combination of calibration and Bayesian estimation. We find that if CPPs are connected to the national grid, steady-state industrial output, GDP, and household consumption decrease due to pre-existing energy price distortions. These results support the second-best theory, which implies that merely connecting the CPPs to the national grid without firstly removing market distortions can lead to economically inefficient outcomes. Instead, government should first consider alternative reforms such as phasing out subsidized tariffs and enabling a competitive market environment.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105468Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105468;
- PII
- S0140988321003546;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Economics
- Journal Volume
- 102
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0140-9883
- CODEN
- EECODR
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53108092
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- CALIBRATION; COST; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY; FINANCING; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT; HOUSEHOLDS; MARKET; POWER GENERATION; POWER PLANTS; STEADY-STATE CONDITIONS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TARIFFS
- Descriptors DEC
- ECONOMICS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.