Published July 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Societal acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies

Description

Australia's renewable energy target (RET) seeks to provide 20 per cent of Australia's electricity generation from renewable energy sources by 2020. As wind power is relatively advanced, it was anticipated that wind power will contribute a major component of the early target. However, high levels of societal resistance to wind farms, combined with new regulatory policies, indicate the RET may not be dominated by wind power. This research involved an examination of seven case studies around wind farm deployment. Qualitative interviews were the primary data for the case studies and analysed using methods informed by grounded theory. Despite the diversity of stakeholder views, the qualitative analysis identified strong community support for wind farms but four common themes emerged that influence this societal acceptance of wind farms in Australia: trust, distributional justice, procedural justice and place attachment. Without addressing these factors through integration into policy development and engagement approaches, wind energy is unlikely to provide the early and majority of new renewable energy. Similar international experiences are incorporated in the discussion of the Australian wind industry's societal acceptance. - Highlights: ► Seven case studies of wind farms in Australia are described. ► Acceptance affects whether wind significantly contributes to the Aust. RE target. ► Four themes were identified regarding societal acceptance of Australian wind farms. ► Four themes are trust, distributional and procedural justice, and place attachment. ► International similarities to the Australian experience are provided

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.009

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.009;
PII
S0301-4215(13)00163-8;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
58
Journal Page Range
p. 200-208
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46025245
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
AUSTRALIA; COMMUNITIES; ENERGY POLICY; POWER GENERATION; PUBLIC OPINION; WIND POWER; WIND TURBINE ARRAYS
Descriptors DEC
AUSTRALASIA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ENERGY SOURCES; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; POWER; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.