Published October 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Modified embedded atom method potential for Fe-Al intermetallics mechanical strength: A comparative analysis of atomistic simulations

  • 1. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) (Norway)
  • 2. Department of Manufacturing and Civil Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, 2815 (Norway)
  • 3. Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim (Norway)
  • 4. SINTEF Materials and Chemistry, Trondheim (Norway)

Description

Highlights: • Modified embedded atom method potential based simulations are performed to characterize the mechanical behavior. • Comparative analysis with DFT, EAM and semi-empirical potential is carried out to determine reliability and suitability of MEAM potentials. • Reasonable structural properties for Fe-Al intermetallic compounds. • Some discrepancies in the mechanical property predictions are observed. The structural and mechanical properties of Fe-Al compounds (FeAl, Fe2Al, Fe3Al, FeAl2, FeAl3, Fe2Al5) have been studied using modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potentials. The equilibrium lattice constants, formation enthalpies, and elastic properties have been investigated and compared with other studies. The calculated lattice constants show good agreement with the embedded atom method (EAM) and density functional theory (DFT) calculations and with experiments. All Fe-Al compounds are mechanically stable according to the elastic constants restrictions. The calculated bulk modulus of the compounds does not show a linear relation with Fe concentration, which is most probably caused by the mechanical anisotropy of Fe-Al compounds. However, comparison of the Fe-Al mechanical properties of MEAM, DFT and EAM-based approaches and experiments show non-consistent differences, which reflects uncertainties with several of these methods, due to assumptions and simplifications imposed during calculations. In general, DFT calculations are closer to experimental observations than semi-empirical potentials. Comprehensive comparisons are made based on theoretical and experimental methodologies.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2021.413157

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.physb.2021.413157;
PII
S0921452621003434;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Physica. B, Condensed Matter
Journal Volume
618
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0921-4526
CODEN
PHYBE3

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.