Published September 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

The effect of hot rolling on the strength and fracture toughness of 90W–7Ni3Fe tungsten heavy metal alloys

  • 1. Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106 (United States)
  • 2. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99354 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • The effect of hot rolling (HR) to 0, 62, 74 and 87% thickness reduction on the strength and precracked fracture toughness (KJm/KIc) of 90%W–10%NiFe tungsten heavy alloy (WHA) was explored. • In the LS orientation, high elastic-plastic KJm was observed in the 0% and 87% HR conditions, along with stable crack growth, while the 62 and 74% HR conditions experienced elastic fracture at a much lower KIc. • The LS toughness variations correlate with the inverse of the WHA strength. • In the LT orientation, the high 0% HR condition KJm is isotropic, while in the 87% HR condition is anisotropic with a the lower KIc. • In all cases, the toughness of WHA are larger than for monolithic W. Due to their balance of strength, ductility and toughness, liquid-phase sintered tungsten heavy metal alloys (WHAs) are considered to be an attractive alternative to monolithic polycrystalline tungsten (W) for plasma facing components. Here we explore the effect of hot rolling (HR) on the room temperature (RT) mechanical properties of a 90W–7Ni3Fe (by wt%) WHA, at different thickness reductions of 0, 62, 74 and 87%. High elastic-plastic KJm maximum load toughness for LS-oriented pre-cracked bend bars is observed in the 0 and 87% HR WHA, along with stable crack growth. In contrast, the 62 and 74% HR WHA experience elastic fracture, at much lower KIc. The opposite trend is observed in the microhardness, as well as the tensile yield and ultimate stresses, which are lowest in the 0 and 87% HR condition and highest in the 62 and 74% HR WHA. The reason for the difference in strength at 87 versus 74% HR reductions is not fully understood. However, the strength differences partially rationalize the toughness trends. Unfortunately, HR results in highly anisotropic brick-and-mortar microstructures, leading to much lower elastic KIc in the LT-orientation.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.141738

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.msea.2021.141738;
PII
S0921509321010066;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Materials Science and Engineering. A, Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing
Journal Volume
824
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0921-5093
CODEN
MSAPE3

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.