Assessing the contribution of cross-sections to the uncertainty of Monte Carlo calculations in micro- and nanodosimetry
Creators
- 1. Institut de Radioprotection et Surete nucleaire - IRSN, BP-17, 92262-Fontenay-aux-Roses (France)
- 2. CRCT, UMR 1037 Inserm, Universite Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR 1037 CRCT, Toulouse (France)
- 3. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt - PTB, Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig (Germany)
- 4. Belgian Nuclear Research Centre - SCK-CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol (Belgium)
- 5. Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf - UKE, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg (Germany)
- 6. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology - KIT, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Karlsruhe (Germany)
Description
Within EURADOS Working Group 6 'Computational Dosimetry', the micro and nanodosimetry task group 6.2 has recently conducted a Monte Carlo (MC) exercise open to participants around the world. The aim of this exercise is to quantify the contribution to the uncertainty of micro and nanodosimetric simulation results arising from the use of different electron-impact cross-sections, and hence physical models, employed by different MC codes (GEANT4-DNA, PENELOPE, MCNP6, FLUKA, NASIC and PHITS). Comparison of the participants' simulation results for both micro and nanodosimetric quantities using different MC codes was the first step of the exercise. The deviation between results is due to different cross-sections but also different tracking methods and particle transport cut-off energies. The second step of the exercise will involve using identical cross-section datasets to account only for the other variations in the first step, thus enabling the determination of the uncertainty contribution due to different cross-sections. This paper presents a comparison of the MC simulation results obtained in the first part of the exercise. For the microdosimetric simulations, particularly in the configuration where the electron source is contained within the micrometric target, the choice of MC code has a small influence on the results. For the nanodosimetric results, on the other hand, the mean ionisation cluster size distribution (ICSD) was sensitive to the physical models used in the MC codes. The ICSD was therefore chosen to study the influence of different cross-section data on the uncertainty of simulation results. (authors)
Availability note (English)
Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncy240Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1093/rpd/ncy240;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry
- Journal Volume
- 183
- Journal Issue
- 1-2
- Journal Page Range
- p. 11-16
- ISSN
- 0144-8420
Conference
- Title
- 17. International Symposium on Microdosimetry
- Acronym
- Micros2017
- Dates
- 5-10 Nov 2017
- Place
- Venice (Italy)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- France
- INIS RN
- 50047163
- Subject category
- S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY; S73: NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; S97: MATHEMATICAL METHODS AND COMPUTING;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- CROSS SECTIONS; DATASETS; DNA; DOSIMETRY; ELECTRON SOURCES; IONIZATION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; SIMULATION
- Descriptors DEC
- CALCULATION METHODS; DOCUMENT TYPES; NUCLEIC ACIDS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PARTICLE SOURCES; RADIATION SOURCES
Optional Information
- Notes
- 14 refs.