Published August 15, 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

Hg(II) removal from water by chitosan and chitosan derivatives: A review

  • 1. Centro de Geociencias-Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Campus Juriquilla, Boulevard Juriquilla 3001, Queretaro, 76230 (Mexico)
  • 2. Centro de Estudios Transdisciplinarios del Agua, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Chorroarin 280, Buenos Aires, 1427 (Argentina)

Description

Mercury (Hg) is one of the most toxic heavy metals commonly found in the global environment. Its toxicity is related to the capacity of its compounds to bioconcentrate in organisms and to biomagnifie through food chain. A wide range of adsorbents has been used for removing Hg(II) from contaminated water. Chitosan is obtained by alkaline deacetylation of chitin. The adsorption capacity of chitosan depends on the origin of the polysaccharide, and on the experimental conditions in the preparation, that determine the degree of deacetylation. A great number of chitosan derivatives have been obtained by crosslinking with glutaraldehyde or epichlorohydrin among others or by grafting new functional groups on the chitosan backbone with the aim of adsorbing Hg(II). The new functional groups are incorporated to change the pH range for Hg(II) sorption and/or to change the sorption sites in order to increase sorption selectivity. The chemical modification affords a wide range of derivatives with modified properties for specific applications. Hg(II) adsorption on chitosan or chitosan derivatives is now assumed to occur through several single or mixed interactions: chelation or coordination on amino groups in a pendant fashion or in combination with vicinal hydroxyl groups, electrostatic attraction in acidic media or ion exchange with protonated amino groups. This review reports the recent developments in the Hg(II) removal in waste water treatment, using chitosan and its derivatives in order to provide useful information about the different technologies. When possibly the adsorption capacity of chitosan and chitosan derivatives under different experimental conditions is reported to help to compare the efficacy of the Hg(II) removal process. A comparison with the adsorption capacity of other low-cost adsorbents is also tabled.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.060

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.060;
PII
S0304-3894(09)00088-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal Volume
167
Journal Issue
1-3
Journal Page Range
p. 10-23
ISSN
0304-3894
CODEN
JHMAD9

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.