Remediation of Uranium in the Hanford Vadose Zone Using Ammonia Gas: FY 2010 Laboratory-Scale Experiments
Creators
- Szecsody, James E.
- Truex, Michael J.
- Zhong, Lirong
- Qafoku, Nikolla
- Williams, Mark D.
- McKinley, James P.
- Wang, Zheming
- Bargar, John
- Faurie, Danielle K.
- Resch, Charles T.
- Phillips, Jerry L.
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA (United States), Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (US)
Description
This investigation is focused on refining an in situ technology for vadose zone remediation of uranium by the addition of ammonia (NH3) gas. Objectives are to: (a) refine the technique of ammonia gas treatment of low water content sediments to minimize uranium mobility by changing uranium surface phases (or coat surface phases), (b) identify the geochemical changes in uranium surface phases during ammonia gas treatment, (c) identify broader geochemical changes that occur in sediment during ammonia gas treatment, and (d) predict and test injection of ammonia gas for intermediate-scale systems to identify process interactions that occur at a larger scale and could impact field scale implementation. Overall, NH3 gas treatment of low-water content sediments appears quite effective at decreasing aqueous, adsorbed uranium concentrations. The NH3 gas treatment is also fairly effective for decreasing the mobility of U-carbonate coprecipitates, but shows mixed success for U present in Na-boltwoodite. There are some changes in U-carbonate surface phases that were identified by surface phase analysis, but no changes observed for Na-boltwoodite. It is likely that dissolution of sediment minerals (predominantly montmorillonite, muscovite, kaolinite) under the alkaline conditions created and subsequent precipitation as the pH returns to natural conditions coat some of the uranium surface phases, although a greater understanding of these processes is needed to predict the long term impact on uranium mobility. Injection of NH3 gas into sediments at low water content (1% to 16% water content) can effectively treat a large area without water addition, so there is little uranium mobilization (i.e., transport over cm or larger scale) during the injection phase.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-20004.pdf; PURL: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1006311-qDb9xW/Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Imprint Pagination
- vp.
- Report number
- PNNL--20004
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 42076819
- Subject category
- S11: NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS; S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Non-conventional Literature
- Descriptors DEI
- AMMONIA; DISSOLUTION; KAOLINITE; MONTMORILLONITE; MUSCOVITE; PRECIPITATION; REFINING; SEDIMENTS; URANIUM; URANIUM CARBONATES; WATER
- Descriptors DEC
- ACTINIDE COMPOUNDS; ACTINIDES; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBONATES; CLAYS; ELEMENTS; HYDRIDES; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; INORGANIC ION EXCHANGERS; ION EXCHANGE MATERIALS; MATERIALS; METALS; MICA; MINERALS; NITROGEN COMPOUNDS; NITROGEN HYDRIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PROCESSING; SEPARATION PROCESSES; SILICATE MINERALS; URANIUM COMPOUNDS
Optional Information
- Contract/Grant/Project number
- 20899; 830403000; AC05-76RL01830
- Notes
- doi 10.2172/1006311
- Funding organization
- US Department of Energy (United States)