A modified gravitational search algorithm based on a non-dominated sorting genetic approach for hydro-thermal-wind economic emission dispatching
- 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Digital Valley Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074 (China)
- 2. School of Hydropower and Information Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074 (China)
- 3. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098 (China)
Description
Wind power is a type of clean and renewable energy, and reasonable utilization of wind power is beneficial to environmental protection and economic development. Therefore, a short-term hydro-thermal-wind economic emission dispatching (SHTW-EED) problem is presented in this paper. The proposed problem aims to distribute the load among hydro, thermal and wind power units to simultaneously minimize economic cost and pollutant emission. To solve the SHTW-EED problem with complex constraints, a modified gravitational search algorithm based on the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-III (MGSA-NSGA-III) is proposed. In the proposed MGSA-NSGA-III, a non-dominated sorting approach, reference-point based selection mechanism and chaotic mutation strategy are applied to improve the evolutionary process of the original gravitational search algorithm (GSA) and maintain the distribution diversity of Pareto optimal solutions. Moreover, a parallel computing strategy is introduced to improve the computational efficiency. Finally, the proposed MGSA-NSGA-III is applied to a typical hydro-thermal-wind system to verify its feasibility and effectiveness. The simulation results indicate that the proposed algorithm can obtain low economic cost and small pollutant emission when dealing with the SHTW-EED problem. - Highlights: • A hybrid algorithm is proposed to handle hydro-thermal-wind power dispatching. • Several improvement strategies are applied to the algorithm. • A parallel computing strategy is applied to improve computational efficiency. • Two cases are analyzed to verify the efficiency of the optimize mode.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.010Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.010;
- PII
- S0360-5442(17)30010-5;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy (Oxford)
- Journal Volume
- 121
- Journal Page Range
- p. 276-291
- ISSN
- 0360-5442
- CODEN
- ENEYDS
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48089286
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ALGORITHMS; CHAOS THEORY; COST; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; LIMITING VALUES; POLLUTANTS; SORTING; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; WIND; WIND POWER
- Descriptors DEC
- EFFICIENCY; ELECTRIC POWER; ENERGY SOURCES; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; MATHEMATICS; POWER; POWER PLANTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.