Influence of test cycle and fuel property on fuel consumption and exhaust emissions of a heavy-duty diesel engine
Creators
- 1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4 (Canada)
- 2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ambient Air Particulate Matter Pollution Prevention and Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300350 (China)
- 3. National Engineering Laboratory for Mobile Source Emission Control Technology, China Automotive Technology & Research Center Co., Ltd., Tianjin, 300300 (China)
- 4. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012 (China)
- 5. School of Environmental Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, 450001 (China)
Description
Highlights: • Impacts of test cycle and fuel type on diesel engine emissions were investigated. • Test cycle, fuel, and their interaction explained >84% of variance in emissions. • PM, CO, and NOx emissions were slightly lower in biodiesel blend than fossil diesel. • Fuel consumption, PM and gas emissions were significantly higher under ETC than ESC. • Higher PAHs in fuels produced more heavy molecular weight PM-bound PAH emission. In this study, dynamometer engine tests were conducted to investigate the impact of test cycle and fuel type on fuel consumption and exhaust emissions of a heavy-duty diesel engine. This study presented novel approaches by utilizing comprehensive statistical analysis to assess these impacts on particulate matter (PM), PM-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and multiple gaseous pollutants. Four types of fuels—two conventional diesels (X and Y) and each with 5% blend of biodiesel—were used under European Transient Cycle (ETC) and European Stationary Cycle (ESC). There were statistically significant higher fuel consumption and emission rates (by 9–73%) under ETC than ESC due to more occurrences of lower engine speeds and loads under ESC, and X fuels had higher emission rates of PM and carbon dioxides ([CO2]; 2.1–13%) but lower rates of hydrocarbons ([THC]; 44%) attributed to higher cetane number, sulfur contents and boiling points. Compared with conventional diesel, biodiesel blend had slightly lower emission rates of PM, CO, and NOX (1.7–6.6%) but higher fuel consumption (1%) and CO2 and THC emission rates (0.9–2.1%). The results of this study contributed to the limited datasets on the interactive effects of test cycle with fuel property on diesel vehicle exhaust emissions.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122705Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122705;
- PII
- S0360544221029546;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy (Oxford)
- Journal Volume
- 244
- Journal Issue
- Part A
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0360-5442
- CODEN
- ENEYDS
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54006517
- Subject category
- S42: ENGINEERING; S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; S37: INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ANTIKNOCK RATINGS; BIODIESEL FUELS; BOILING POINTS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON MONOXIDE; DIESEL ENGINES; DYNAMOMETERS; EFFICIENCY; EXHAUST GASES; FUEL CONSUMPTION; NITROGEN OXIDES; PARTICULATES; PERFORMANCE; POLLUTANTS; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS; SULFUR CONTENT; TRANSIENTS
- Descriptors DEC
- ALTERNATIVE FUELS; AROMATICS; BIOFUELS; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENGINES; FLUIDS; FUELS; GASEOUS WASTES; GASES; HEAT ENGINES; HYDROCARBONS; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES; LIQUID FUELS; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; NITROGEN COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PARTICLES; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES; TRANSITION TEMPERATURE; WASTES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.