Published August 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

Long-term scenario analysis of nuclear energy and variable renewables in Japan's power generation mix considering flexible power resources

  • 1. Resilience Engineering Research Center, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656 (Japan)
  • 2. Department of Nuclear Engineering and Management, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656 (Japan)

Description

This paper comprehensively analyzes an optimal deployment of variable renewables (VRs) with flexible power resources, such as electricity saving and rechargeable battery, in Japan's long-term power generation mix to 2050 under possible nuclear energy scenarios. The study is performed, employing a dynamic high time-resolution optimal power generation mix model which is formulated as a large-scale linear programming model. Simulation results show that both complete nuclear phase-out and carbon reduction by 80% in 2050 from 2010 encourage VR expansion in the country's power system and cause a quadruple increase of power generation cost at 2050 compared with that under current nuclear capacity and no carbon regulation policy; long-term cost reduction of VR energy system is necessary if VR is positioned as a mainstream for future sustainable power supply. Secondly, higher levels of VR integration decrease the capacity factor of LNG combined cycle (LNGCC), which implies the challenge to assure LNGCC serving as a remunerated ramp generator for VR intermittency. Finally, as an economically optimal solution, electricity saving serves as an important option to integrate massive VR and to treat a seasonal imbalance of its power output in an efficient way. -- Highlights: •Authors analyze Japan's long-term scenarios of nuclear and variable renewables. •The analysis is performed by a dynamic optimal power generation mix model. •Nuclear phase-out and carbon regulation quadruple power generation cost in 2050. •Higher PV shares present challenges to make LNGCC a profitable ramp generator. •Power saving is an economical option to treat an imbalance caused by PV output

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.005

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.005;
PII
S0301-4215(15)00147-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
83
Journal Issue
Complete
Journal Page Range
p. 169-184
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.