Published March 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Fate of pharmaceuticals in a spray-irrigation system: From wastewater to groundwater

  • 1. Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 (United States)
  • 2. United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, University Park, PA 16802 (United States)
  • 3. Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • 7 pharmaceuticals were tracked through a wastewater treatment plant and reuse site. • Removal efficiencies through the treatment plant varied by season and by compound. • Pharmaceuticals posed a medium to high risk to aquatic ecosystem health. • Groundwater concentrations were ~2 orders of magnitude lower than those in effluent. • Pharmaceutical concentrations in groundwater posed minimal human health risk. -- Abstract: Land application of wastewater effluent is beneficial for recharging groundwater aquifers and avoiding direct pollutant discharges to surface waters. However, the fate of non-regulated organic wastewater pollutants, such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), in such wastewater reuse systems is understudied. Here, a 14-month study (October 2016 through December 2017) was conducted to evaluate the fate and potential risks of seven commonly used PPCPs in a local wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and from 13 groundwater monitoring wells at a spray-irrigation site where effluent has been spray-irrigated since the early 1980s. Acetaminophen and trimethoprim were the most frequently detected (93%) PPCPs in WWTP influent, while in the effluent, caffeine and trimethoprim were detected most frequently (70%). Wastewater treatment generally reduced concentrations of acetaminophen and caffeine by >88%; however, some compounds had low removal or were present at higher concentrations in the effluent compared with influent (e.g. naproxen, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim and ofloxacin). Seasonal trends were observed, with higher PPCP concentrations in the WWTP influent and effluent in the winter. Risk calculations conducted on the wastewater effluent suggest that the risk posed by PPCPs that persisted in the effluent are medium to high to aquatic organisms. Detection frequencies of PPCPs were lower in groundwater samples compared to the effluent, with sulfamethoxazole (40%) and caffeine (32%) as the most frequently detected compounds. Similarly, average concentrations of PPCPs in groundwater were found to be nearly two orders of magnitude lower than concentrations in the effluent. Minimal seasonal influence was observed for groundwater samples. Human health risk assessments indicate that concentrations in groundwater, which is used as a drinking water source, appear to pose minimal risk.

Additional details

Additional titles

Augmented title (English)
PPCPs;WWTP;LOD;LOQ;RQ;PNEC;DWI;ADI;DWEL

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.442;
PII
S0048969718343432;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
654
Journal Page Range
p. 197-208
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.