Published September 1, 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

EPI-CT: design, challenges and epidemiological methods of an international study on cancer risk after paediatric and young adult CT

  • 1. Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona (Spain)
  • 2. Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University (UNEW), Newcastle upon Tyne (United Kingdom)
  • 3. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon (France)
  • 4. Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses (France)
  • 5. Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK-CEN), Mol (Belgium)
  • 6. The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 7. Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK-CEN), Mol (Belgium)
  • 8. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (Sweden)
  • 9. Centre d'Assurance de Qualité des Applications Technologiques dans le domaine de la Santé, Bourg-La-Reine (France)
  • 10. Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Esch/Alzette (Luxembourg)
  • 11. Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz (Germany)
  • 12. Oncology, Finsen Centre Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen (Denmark)
  • 13. Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of population-based cancer research, Oslo (Norway)
  • 14. Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Østerås (Norway)

Description

Computed tomography (CT) has great clinical utility and its usage has increased dramatically over the years. Concerns have been raised, however, about health impacts of ionising radiation exposure from CTs, particularly in children, who have a higher risk for some radiation induced diseases. Direct estimation of the health impact of these exposures is needed, but the conduct of epidemiological studies of paediatric CT populations poses a number of challenges which, if not addressed, could invalidate the results. The aim of the present paper is to review the main challenges of a study on the health impact of paediatric CTs and how the protocol of the European collaborative study EPI-CT, coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), is designed to address them. The study, based on a common protocol, is being conducted in Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom and it has recruited over one million patients suitable for long-term prospective follow-up. Cohort accrual relies on records of participating hospital radiology departments. Basic demographic information and technical data on the CT procedure needed to estimate organ doses are being abstracted and passive follow-up is being conducted by linkage to population-based cancer and mortality registries. The main issues which may affect the validity of study results include missing doses from other radiological procedures, missing CTs, confounding by CT indication and socioeconomic status and dose reconstruction. Sub-studies are underway to evaluate their potential impact. By focusing on the issues which challenge the validity of risk estimates from CT exposures, EPI-CT will be able to address limitations of previous CT studies, thus providing reliable estimates of risk of solid tumours and leukaemia from paediatric CT exposures and scientific bases for the optimisation of paediatric CT protocols and patient protection. (paper)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/611

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal Volume
35
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 611-628
ISSN
0952-4746
CODEN
JRPREA

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47103504
Subject category
S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
Descriptors DEI
CHILDREN; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; HEALTH HAZARDS; HOSPITALS; LEUKEMIA; MORTALITY; OPTIMIZATION; PATIENTS
Descriptors DEC
AGE GROUPS; ANIMALS; BUILDINGS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; HAZARDS; IMMUNE SYSTEM DISEASES; MAMMALS; MAN; MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENTS; NEOPLASMS; PRIMATES; TOMOGRAPHY; VERTEBRATES