Critical review of the first-law efficiency in different power combined cycle architectures
Creators
- 1. Ind. Eng. Dept., University of A Coruna (Spain)
- 2. Energy and Prop. Dept., University of A Coruna (Spain)
- 3. HEPIA, University of Geneva (Switzerland)
Description
Highlights: • The adiabatic expansion based TC can improve the energy efficiency of CCs. • A revolutionary TC can be a starting point to develop high-performance CCs. • A theoretical thermal efficiency of 83.7% was reached in a Nuclear Power Plant using a TC as bottoming cycle. - Abstract: This critical review explores the potential of an innovative trilateral thermodynamic cycle used to transform low-grade heat into mechanical work and compares its performance with relevant traditional thermodynamic cycles in combined cycles. The aim of this work is to show that combined cycles use traditional low efficiency power cycles in their bottoming cycle, and to evaluate theoretically the implementation of alternative power bottoming cycles. Different types of combined cycles have been reviewed, highlighting their relevant characteristics. The efficiencies of power plants using combined cycles are reviewed and compared. The relevance of researching thermodynamic cycles for combined cycle applications is that a vast amount of heat energy is available at negligible cost in the bottoming cycle of a combined cycle, with the drawback that existing thermal cycles cannot make efficient use of such available low temperature heat due to their low efficiency. The first-law efficiency is used as a parameter to compare and suggest improvements in the combined cycles (CCs) reviewed. The analysis shows that trilateral cycles using closed processes are by far the most efficient published thermal cycles for combined cycles to transform low-grade heat into mechanical work. An innovative trilateral bottoming cycle is proposed to show that the application of non-traditional power cycles can increase significantly the first-law efficiency of CCs. The highest first-law efficiencies achieved are: 85.55% in a CC using LNG cool, 73.82% for a transport vehicle CC, 74.40% in a marine CC, 83.07% in a CC for nuclear power plants, 73.82% in a CC using Brayton and Rankine cycles, 78.31% in a CC with solar integration and 69.21% in a CC using gasification for combustion. Thus, this work shows that a trilateral cycle can be a starting point to explore new ways to convert energy.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.06.037Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.06.037;
- PII
- S0196-8904(17)30579-4;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Journal Volume
- 148
- Journal Page Range
- p. 844-859
- ISSN
- 0196-8904
- CODEN
- ECMADL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 49047921
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S14: SOLAR ENERGY;
- Descriptors DEI
- BOTTOMING CYCLES; COMBINED CYCLES; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; GRAN SASSO NATIONAL LABORATORY; HEAT; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PLANNING; RANKINE CYCLE; REVIEWS; TEMPERATURE RANGE 0065-0273 K; THERMAL EFFICIENCY; THERMODYNAMICS
- Descriptors DEC
- DOCUMENT TYPES; EFFICIENCY; ENERGY; ENERGY SOURCES; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; LIQUEFIED GASES; LIQUIDS; NATURAL GAS; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; TEMPERATURE RANGE; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.